vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GRIFFON CORP (GFF) and OLYMPIC STEEL INC (ZEUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GRIFFON CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($649.1M vs $490.7M, roughly 1.3× OLYMPIC STEEL INC). GRIFFON CORP runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs 0.4%, a 9.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OLYMPIC STEEL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.4% vs 2.6%). GRIFFON CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($99.3M vs $-12.9M). Over the past eight quarters, OLYMPIC STEEL INC's revenue compounded faster (0.1% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Griffon Corporation is a multinational conglomerate headquartered in New York City. It operates as a diversified management and holding company. The company has four subsidiaries: Ames True Temper, ClosetMaid, Clopay Building Products, and CornellCookson. Griffon has been publicly traded since 1961 and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange as a component stock of the S&P SmallCap 600, S&P Composite 1500, and Russell 2000 indices.
Olympic Steel, Inc. is a metals service center based in Cleveland, Ohio. The company processes and distributes carbon, coated and stainless flat-rolled sheet, coil and plate steel, aluminium alloy, tin plate, and metal-intensive branded products primarily in the United States. Metals processing and value added services include tempering, stretch leveling, cutting-to-length, slitting, edging, shearing, blanking, burning, forming, shot blasting, laser punching, plate rolling, fabricating, machi...
GFF vs ZEUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $649.1M | $490.7M |
| Net Profit | $64.4M | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | 41.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 17.5% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | 9.9% | 0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | 4.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.1% | -21.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.41 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $649.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $662.2M | $490.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $613.6M | $496.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $611.7M | $492.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $632.4M | $418.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $659.7M | $470.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $647.8M | $526.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $672.9M | $526.6M |
| Q4 25 | $64.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.6M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-120.1M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.8M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.9M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.5M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.1M | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $64.1M | $8.7M |
| Q4 25 | 41.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.9% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -19.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | $1.41 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.04 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.65 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.21 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.49 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.29 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.84 | $0.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.28 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $95.3M | $7.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $240.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $108.9M | $579.1M |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $95.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.0M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.3M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $127.8M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $152.0M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $114.4M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.5M | $9.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.0M | $10.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $240.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $233.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $235.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $272.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $197.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $209.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $196.8M |
| Q4 25 | $108.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.0M | $579.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.9M | $578.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.7M | $574.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $227.8M | $573.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $224.9M | $570.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $223.5M | $569.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $202.2M | $563.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.71× | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.16× | 0.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.48× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.78× | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.74× | 0.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.84× | 0.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.0M | $-5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $99.3M | $-12.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.3% | -2.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.66× | -2.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $278.9M | $41.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $107.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $75.0M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.1M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $49.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $142.9M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $24.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.1M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.8M | $-2.6M |
| Q4 25 | $99.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.4M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.4M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8M | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $125.5M | $7.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.6M | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.5M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.8M | $-7.4M |
| Q4 25 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.6% | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | -1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.66× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | -2.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.29× | 19.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.02× | 3.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.15× | 9.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.97× | -0.38× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.62× | -0.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GFF
| Consumer And Professional Products | $241.1M | 37% |
| Residential Repairand Remodel | $202.1M | 31% |
| International Excluding North America | $97.8M | 15% |
| Retail | $47.3M | 7% |
| Residential New Construction | $32.5M | 5% |
| Other | $14.2M | 2% |
| Industrial | $14.1M | 2% |
ZEUS
| Carbon Flat Products | $268.2M | 55% |
| Specialty Metals Flat Products | $140.9M | 29% |
| Tubular And Pipe Products | $81.6M | 17% |
