vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of GFL Environmental Inc. (GFL) and Kimberly-Clark (KMB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

GFL Environmental Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.9B vs $4.2B, roughly 1.2× Kimberly-Clark). Kimberly-Clark runs the higher net margin — 16.2% vs -13.9%, a 30.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.

GFL Environmental Inc. is an American-Canadian waste management company founded in Vaughan, Ontario, with headquarters in Miami Beach, Florida. Founded in 2007, GFL operates in all provinces in Canada and much of the United States, and currently employs more than 20,000 people. The company provides environmental services to municipal, residential, commercial, industrial and institutional customers.

Kimberly-Clark Corporation is an American multinational consumer goods and personal care corporation that produces mostly paper-based consumer products. The company manufactures sanitary paper products and surgical & medical instruments. Kimberly-Clark brand name products include Kleenex facial tissue, Kotex feminine hygiene products, Cottonelle, Scott and Andrex toilet paper, Wypall utility wipes, KimWipes scientific cleaning wipes and Huggies disposable diapers and baby wipes.

GFL vs KMB — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
GFL
GFL
1.2× larger
GFL
$4.9B
$4.2B
KMB
Higher net margin
KMB
KMB
30.1% more per $
KMB
16.2%
-13.9%
GFL

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
GFL
GFL
KMB
KMB
Revenue
$4.9B
$4.2B
Net Profit
$-686.1M
$675.0M
Gross Margin
36.8%
Operating Margin
18.1%
Net Margin
-13.9%
16.2%
Revenue YoY
2.7%
Net Profit YoY
17.8%
EPS (diluted)
$2.00

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GFL
GFL
KMB
KMB
Q1 26
$4.2B
Q4 25
$3.3B
Q3 25
$4.9B
$4.2B
Q2 25
$3.2B
$4.2B
Q1 25
$1.6B
$4.8B
Q4 24
$4.9B
Q3 24
$5.9B
$5.0B
Q2 24
$3.9B
$5.0B
Net Profit
GFL
GFL
KMB
KMB
Q1 26
$675.0M
Q4 25
$499.0M
Q3 25
$-686.1M
$446.0M
Q2 25
$-727.7M
$509.0M
Q1 25
$-195.8M
$567.0M
Q4 24
$447.0M
Q3 24
$94.3M
$907.0M
Q2 24
$544.0M
Gross Margin
GFL
GFL
KMB
KMB
Q1 26
36.8%
Q4 25
37.7%
Q3 25
36.0%
Q2 25
35.0%
Q1 25
35.8%
Q4 24
34.0%
Q3 24
36.0%
Q2 24
36.0%
Operating Margin
GFL
GFL
KMB
KMB
Q1 26
18.1%
Q4 25
11.2%
Q3 25
15.0%
Q2 25
14.2%
Q1 25
15.9%
Q4 24
11.1%
Q3 24
23.3%
Q2 24
13.0%
Net Margin
GFL
GFL
KMB
KMB
Q1 26
16.2%
Q4 25
15.1%
Q3 25
-13.9%
10.7%
Q2 25
-22.5%
12.2%
Q1 25
-12.6%
11.7%
Q4 24
9.1%
Q3 24
1.6%
18.3%
Q2 24
10.8%
EPS (diluted)
GFL
GFL
KMB
KMB
Q1 26
$2.00
Q4 25
$1.50
Q3 25
$1.34
Q2 25
$1.53
Q1 25
$1.70
Q4 24
$1.34
Q3 24
$2.69
Q2 24
$1.61

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GFL
GFL
KMB
KMB
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$542.0K
Total DebtLower is stronger
$6.5M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.9M
Total Assets
$17.2M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
3.38×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GFL
GFL
KMB
KMB
Q1 26
$542.0K
Q4 25
$688.0M
Q3 25
$617.0M
Q2 25
$634.0M
Q1 25
$563.0M
Q4 24
$1.0B
Q3 24
$1.1B
Q2 24
$1.2B
Total Debt
GFL
GFL
KMB
KMB
Q1 26
$6.5M
Q4 25
$6.5B
Q3 25
$6.5B
Q2 25
$6.5B
Q1 25
$6.5B
Q4 24
$6.9B
Q3 24
$6.9B
Q2 24
$7.2B
Stockholders' Equity
GFL
GFL
KMB
KMB
Q1 26
$1.9M
Q4 25
$1.5B
Q3 25
$1.3B
Q2 25
$1.3B
Q1 25
$1.1B
Q4 24
$840.0M
Q3 24
$1.3B
Q2 24
$1.1B
Total Assets
GFL
GFL
KMB
KMB
Q1 26
$17.2M
Q4 25
$17.1B
Q3 25
$16.9B
Q2 25
$16.8B
Q1 25
$16.3B
Q4 24
$16.5B
Q3 24
$17.2B
Q2 24
$17.3B
Debt / Equity
GFL
GFL
KMB
KMB
Q1 26
3.38×
Q4 25
4.31×
Q3 25
4.86×
Q2 25
5.09×
Q1 25
5.89×
Q4 24
8.18×
Q3 24
5.36×
Q2 24
6.30×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

GFL
GFL

Segment breakdown not available.

KMB
KMB

NA$2.7B64%
IPC$1.5B36%

Related Comparisons