vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) and Lululemon Athletica (LULU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lululemon Athletica is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.6B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.5× GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.). GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. runs the higher net margin — 14.8% vs 12.0%, a 2.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Lululemon Athletica posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.1% vs -2.9%). Over the past eight quarters, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-4.3% CAGR vs -10.5%).
GlobalFoundries Inc. is a multinational semiconductor contract manufacturing and design company domiciled in the Cayman Islands and headquartered in Malta, New York. Created by the divestiture of the manufacturing arm of AMD in March 2009, the company was privately owned by Mubadala Investment Company, a sovereign wealth fund of the United Arab Emirates, until an initial public offering (IPO) in October 2021. Mubadala remains the majority owner of the company with an 82% stake.
Lululemon, commonly styled as lululemon, is an American-Canadian multinational athletic apparel retailer headquartered in Vancouver, British Columbia, and incorporated in Delaware, United States, as Lululemon Athletica Inc. It was founded in 1998 as a retailer of yoga pants and other yoga wear, and has expanded to also sell sportswear, lifestyle apparel, accessories and personal care products. The company has 767 stores and also processes sales online through its website.
GFS vs LULU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $2.6B |
| Net Profit | $249.0M | $306.8M |
| Gross Margin | 24.8% | 55.6% |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | 17.0% |
| Net Margin | 14.8% | 12.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.9% | 7.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 39.9% | -12.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $2.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $306.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $249.0M | $370.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.0M | $314.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $211.0M | $748.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $351.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $178.0M | $392.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $321.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $134.0M | $669.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 55.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.8% | 58.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.2% | 58.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.4% | 60.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 58.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.8% | 59.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | 57.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.4% | 59.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | 18.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.5% | 28.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 22.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | 19.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | 28.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.8% | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.5% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.3% | 20.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.2% | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 20.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.44 | $3.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.41 | $2.60 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.38 | $6.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.87 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.32 | $3.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.28 | $2.54 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.24 | $5.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.0B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.8B | $4.5B |
| Total Assets | $16.7B | $8.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.8B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5B | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.1B | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.6B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.3B | $4.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.7B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.8B | $7.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5B | $7.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.1B | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $595.0M | $249.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $82.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 3.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 6.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.39× | 0.81× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $249.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $595.0M | $328.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $431.0M | $-119.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $331.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $300.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $375.0M | $443.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $402.0M | $127.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $488.0M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $82.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $150.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-271.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $122.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $298.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -11.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.39× | 0.89× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.89× | -0.38× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.57× | 1.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.11× | 1.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.59× | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.64× | 2.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GFS
| Smart Mobile Devices | $752.0M | 45% |
| Automotive | $306.0M | 18% |
| Home And Industrial Io T | $258.0M | 15% |
| Goods Or Services Transferred Over Time | $198.0M | 12% |
| Communications Infrastructure Datacenter | $175.0M | 10% |
LULU
| Womens Apparel | $1.6B | 64% |
| Mens Apparel | $596.2M | 23% |
| Accessories And Other Categories | $324.7M | 13% |
