vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of GRACO INC (GGG) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

GRACO INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($593.2M vs $558.0M, roughly 1.1× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 22.3%, a 7.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GRACO INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.1% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, GRACO INC's revenue compounded faster (9.8% CAGR vs 5.6%).

Graco Inc. is an American industrial company that specializes in the development and manufacturing of fluid-handling systems and products. The company is headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and markets its products to customers worldwide.

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

GGG vs KIM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
GGG
GGG
1.1× larger
GGG
$593.2M
$558.0M
KIM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
GGG
GGG
+4.1% gap
GGG
8.1%
4.0%
KIM
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
7.5% more per $
KIM
29.8%
22.3%
GGG
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
GGG
GGG
Annualised
GGG
9.8%
5.6%
KIM

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
GGG
GGG
KIM
KIM
Revenue
$593.2M
$558.0M
Net Profit
$132.5M
$166.3M
Gross Margin
51.7%
Operating Margin
26.7%
37.2%
Net Margin
22.3%
29.8%
Revenue YoY
8.1%
4.0%
Net Profit YoY
21.9%
23.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.78
$0.46

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GGG
GGG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$558.0M
Q4 25
$593.2M
$542.5M
Q3 25
$543.4M
$535.9M
Q2 25
$571.8M
$525.2M
Q1 25
$528.3M
$536.6M
Q4 24
$548.7M
$525.4M
Q3 24
$519.2M
$507.6M
Q2 24
$553.2M
$500.2M
Net Profit
GGG
GGG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$132.5M
$151.2M
Q3 25
$137.6M
$137.8M
Q2 25
$127.6M
$163.0M
Q1 25
$124.1M
$132.8M
Q4 24
$108.7M
$166.0M
Q3 24
$122.2M
$136.0M
Q2 24
$133.0M
$119.7M
Gross Margin
GGG
GGG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
51.7%
Q3 25
53.2%
Q2 25
52.4%
Q1 25
52.6%
Q4 24
50.9%
Q3 24
53.2%
Q2 24
54.4%
Operating Margin
GGG
GGG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
26.7%
36.4%
Q3 25
30.3%
34.9%
Q2 25
27.5%
39.2%
Q1 25
27.3%
33.6%
Q4 24
23.7%
31.7%
Q3 24
28.1%
33.7%
Q2 24
29.2%
32.1%
Net Margin
GGG
GGG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
22.3%
27.9%
Q3 25
25.3%
25.7%
Q2 25
22.3%
31.0%
Q1 25
23.5%
24.8%
Q4 24
19.8%
31.6%
Q3 24
23.5%
26.8%
Q2 24
24.0%
23.9%
EPS (diluted)
GGG
GGG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
$0.78
Q3 25
$0.82
Q2 25
$0.76
Q1 25
$0.72
Q4 24
$0.63
Q3 24
$0.71
Q2 24
$0.77

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GGG
GGG
KIM
KIM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$624.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$2.7B
$10.4B
Total Assets
$3.3B
$19.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GGG
GGG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$624.1M
$211.6M
Q3 25
$618.7M
$159.3M
Q2 25
$534.9M
$226.6M
Q1 25
$536.1M
$131.3M
Q4 24
$675.3M
$688.6M
Q3 24
$764.5M
$789.0M
Q2 24
$666.0M
$126.4M
Total Debt
GGG
GGG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$8.0B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
GGG
GGG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$2.7B
$10.4B
Q3 25
$2.6B
$10.5B
Q2 25
$2.5B
$10.5B
Q1 25
$2.5B
$10.6B
Q4 24
$2.6B
$10.7B
Q3 24
$2.5B
$10.5B
Q2 24
$2.4B
$10.6B
Total Assets
GGG
GGG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$3.3B
$19.7B
Q3 25
$3.2B
$19.9B
Q2 25
$3.0B
$19.8B
Q1 25
$3.0B
$19.7B
Q4 24
$3.1B
$20.3B
Q3 24
$3.0B
$20.1B
Q2 24
$2.9B
$19.5B
Debt / Equity
GGG
GGG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.75×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GGG
GGG
KIM
KIM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$196.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$184.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
31.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.48×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$637.9M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GGG
GGG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$196.3M
$258.4M
Q3 25
$179.2M
$332.4M
Q2 25
$182.7M
$305.4M
Q1 25
$125.4M
$223.8M
Q4 24
$185.2M
$239.5M
Q3 24
$178.6M
$295.9M
Q2 24
$139.0M
$294.1M
Free Cash Flow
GGG
GGG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$184.3M
Q3 25
$175.7M
Q2 25
$163.1M
Q1 25
$114.8M
$205.4M
Q4 24
$171.3M
Q3 24
$159.2M
Q2 24
$102.7M
FCF Margin
GGG
GGG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
31.1%
Q3 25
32.3%
Q2 25
28.5%
Q1 25
21.7%
38.3%
Q4 24
31.2%
Q3 24
30.7%
Q2 24
18.6%
Capex Intensity
GGG
GGG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.0%
0.0%
Q3 25
0.6%
0.0%
Q2 25
3.4%
0.0%
Q1 25
2.0%
3.4%
Q4 24
2.5%
Q3 24
3.7%
Q2 24
6.6%
Cash Conversion
GGG
GGG
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.48×
1.71×
Q3 25
1.30×
2.41×
Q2 25
1.43×
1.87×
Q1 25
1.01×
1.69×
Q4 24
1.70×
1.44×
Q3 24
1.46×
2.18×
Q2 24
1.05×
2.46×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

GGG
GGG

Industrial$284.3M48%
Contractor$265.5M45%
Other$43.4M7%

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

Related Comparisons