vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd. (GHG) and Waystar Holding Corp. (WAY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Waystar Holding Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($303.5M vs $286.9M, roughly 1.1× GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd.). Waystar Holding Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($57.2M vs $16.2M).
GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd. is a pure play franchised hotel operator, headquartered in Shanghai, China, with the majority of its hotels both franchised-and-managed. In 2017, GreenTree was the fourth largest economy to mid-scale hotel group in China based on the number of hotel rooms according to China Hospitality Association.
Waystar Holding Corp is a leading provider of integrated healthcare payment and revenue cycle management solutions. It serves healthcare providers, health systems, and payers across the United States, offering tools that streamline billing, claims processing, patient payment collection, and revenue optimization to reduce administrative burdens and improve financial performance for healthcare organizations.
GHG vs WAY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $286.9M | $303.5M |
| Net Profit | — | $20.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 19.4% |
| Net Margin | — | 6.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 24.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 4.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $303.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $268.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $270.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $256.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $244.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $286.9M | $240.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $234.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $224.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $20.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $30.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $32.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $29.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-27.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-15.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 25.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 15.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -11.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -7.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $61.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $3.9B |
| Total Assets | — | $5.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.38× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $61.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $421.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $290.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $224.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $182.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $127.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $68.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $57.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $20.3M | $66.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.2M | $57.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.6% | 18.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $283.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $66.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $82.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $96.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $64.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.3M | $78.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $57.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $76.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $91.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $58.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.2M | $70.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | 29.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.68× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GHG
Segment breakdown not available.
WAY
| Subscription And Circulation | $167.8M | 55% |
| Volume Based Revenue | $134.2M | 44% |
| Implementation Services And Other Revenue | $1.5M | 1% |