vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP (GHI) and Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($15.0M vs $13.8M, roughly 1.1× Gossamer Bio, Inc.). Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP runs the higher net margin — -38.9% vs -342.3%, a 303.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gossamer Bio, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (47.1% vs -33.6%).
Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP is a publicly traded real estate investment partnership focused on acquiring, owning, and managing affordable and workforce multifamily housing properties across the United States. It prioritizes investments that generate stable long-term returns while expanding housing access for low and middle income communities.
Gossamer Bio, Inc. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering, developing and commercializing novel therapeutics for patients with serious immunology, inflammation and oncology conditions. It advances a pipeline of proprietary product candidates across multiple clinical phases, primarily serving healthcare markets in North America and other global regions.
GHI vs GOSS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.0M | $13.8M |
| Net Profit | $-5.8M | $-47.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -33.4% | -333.6% |
| Net Margin | -38.9% | -342.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -33.6% | 47.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -157.6% | -43.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.31 | $-0.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $15.0M | $13.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.7M | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.0M | $95.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.4M | $0 |
| Q4 25 | $-5.8M | $-47.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | $-48.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2M | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.6M | $-41.9M |
| Q4 25 | -33.4% | -333.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | -369.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.6% | 54.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -38.9% | -342.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | -362.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.6% | 51.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.31 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.03 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.35 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.38 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.23 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.19 | $0.22 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.42 | $-0.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $39.5M | $136.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $-122.8M |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $172.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $39.5M | $136.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.2M | $180.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.0M | $354.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $244.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-122.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-82.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $81.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $26.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $172.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $208.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $373.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $259.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $37.5M | $-48.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $37.5M | $-48.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4M | $-36.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.1M | $116.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4M | $-52.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.25× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.11× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.98× | 2.36× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.32× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
