vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CGI INC (GIB) and Lilly (Eli) (LLY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lilly (Eli) is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($19.3B vs $11.0B, roughly 1.8× CGI INC).
CGI Inc. is a Canadian multinational information technology consulting and software development company headquartered in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. CGI went public in 1986 with a primary listing on the Toronto Stock Exchange. CGI is also a constituent of the S&P/TSX 60 and has a secondary listing on the New York Stock Exchange.
Eli Lilly and Company, doing business as Lilly, is an American multinational pharmaceutical company headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana, with offices in 18 countries. Its products are sold in approximately 125 countries. The company was founded in 1876 by Eli Lilly, a pharmaceutical chemist and Union army veteran during the American Civil War for whom the company was later named.
GIB vs LLY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.0B | $19.3B |
| Net Profit | — | $6.6B |
| Gross Margin | — | 82.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 42.8% |
| Net Margin | — | 34.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 42.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 50.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $7.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $19.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0B | $11.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $970.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 82.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 82.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 84.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 82.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 82.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 81.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 80.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 80.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 42.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 37.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 36.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 26.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 25.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $7.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $26.5B |
| Total Assets | — | $112.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $29.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $26.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $23.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $18.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | $112.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $114.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $100.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $89.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $78.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $75.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $71.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $63.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.5B | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.4B | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 12.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.49× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.55× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.83× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.49× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.52× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GIB
Segment breakdown not available.
LLY
| Other | $5.4B | 28% |
| Zepbound | $4.2B | 22% |
| Mounjaro | $4.1B | 21% |
| Verzenio | $997.1M | 5% |
| Collaborationand Other Revenue | $991.7M | 5% |
| Taltz | $724.3M | 4% |
| Trulicity | $692.8M | 4% |
| Other Cardiometabolic Health | $524.5M | 3% |
| Other Oncology | $514.8M | 3% |
| Jardiance | $465.8M | 2% |
| Neuroscience | $320.2M | 2% |
| Other Immunology | $187.3M | 1% |
| Other Product Total | $77.0M | 0% |
