vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL Co (GIC) and Verisign (VRSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Verisign is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($425.3M vs $345.6M, roughly 1.2× GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL Co). Verisign runs the higher net margin — 48.5% vs 4.2%, a 44.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.3% vs 7.6%). Verisign produced more free cash flow last quarter ($285.1M vs $19.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Verisign's revenue compounded faster (5.2% CAGR vs 3.4%).
Global Industrial Company is a Port Washington, New York–based company providing industrial and MRO products through a system of branded e-Commerce websites and relationship marketers in North America. The primary brand is Global Industrial.
Verisign, Inc. is an American company based in Reston, Virginia, that operates a diverse array of network infrastructure, including two of the Internet's thirteen root nameservers, the authoritative registry for the .com, .net, and .name generic top-level domains and the .cc country-code top-level domains, and the back-end systems for the .jobs and .edu sponsored top-level domains.
GIC vs VRSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $345.6M | $425.3M |
| Net Profit | $14.6M | $206.2M |
| Gross Margin | 34.5% | 88.5% |
| Operating Margin | 5.7% | 67.0% |
| Net Margin | 4.2% | 48.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.3% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 36.4% | 7.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.37 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $345.6M | $425.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $353.6M | $419.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $358.9M | $409.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $321.0M | $402.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $302.3M | $395.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $342.4M | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $347.8M | $387.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $323.4M | $384.3M |
| Q4 25 | $14.6M | $206.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.8M | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.1M | $207.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.6M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.7M | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.8M | $201.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.3M | $198.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.2M | $194.1M |
| Q4 25 | 34.5% | 88.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.6% | 88.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.1% | 88.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.9% | 87.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.8% | 87.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.0% | 88.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.2% | 87.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.3% | 87.2% |
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | 67.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 68.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | 67.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | 66.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | 68.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | 68.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | 67.4% |
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 48.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | 49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.5% | 48.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | 51.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 51.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.1% | 50.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.37 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.48 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.65 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.35 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.28 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.34 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $67.5M | $580.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $313.2M | $-2.2B |
| Total Assets | $580.8M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $67.5M | $580.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.2M | $617.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.1M | $593.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.0M | $648.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.6M | $599.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.9M | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.8M | $689.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.9M | $924.7M |
| Q4 25 | $313.2M | $-2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $316.0M | $-2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $305.2M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $287.9M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $281.1M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $279.2M | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $270.4M | $-1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $260.2M | $-1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $580.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $602.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $586.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $520.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $531.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $542.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $517.4M | $1.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $20.0M | $289.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $19.2M | $285.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.6% | 67.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.37× | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $74.7M | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $20.0M | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.7M | $307.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.7M | $202.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4M | $291.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.9M | $231.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.6M | $253.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.8M | $160.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.4M | $257.3M |
| Q4 25 | $19.2M | $285.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.0M | $303.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.3M | $194.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2M | $285.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.2M | $222.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7M | $247.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.9M | $151.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1M | $253.5M |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | 72.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 63.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 66.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.37× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.21× | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.26× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.25× | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.49× | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.57× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.93× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.48× | 1.33× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
