vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD (GILT) and IOVANCE BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC. (IOVA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($152.7M vs $86.8M, roughly 1.8× IOVANCE BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.).
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. is an Israeli public company. It provides satellite-based broadband communications technology, its main expertise being the development, manufacture, and marketing of ground-based satellite systems for global communication via satellites.
Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. is a biopharmaceutical startup based in San Carlos, California. The company works to develop tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapies against cancer.
GILT vs IOVA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $152.7M | $86.8M |
| Net Profit | $6.3M | — |
| Gross Margin | 35.8% | 67.4% |
| Operating Margin | 5.4% | -84.7% |
| Net Margin | 4.1% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | 17.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $57016808.00 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $86.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.7M | $60.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $49.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $73.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $58.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.6M | $31.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $715.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-91.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $-111.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-116.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-83.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $-97.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-113.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 67.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 68.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 46.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.7% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -84.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -140.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | -189.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -245.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -117.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -152.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | -327.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -16464.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -135.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | -186.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -235.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -142.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | -312.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -15800.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $57016808.00 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.36 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $56622204.00 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $64.9M | $297.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $56.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $315.8M | $698.6M |
| Total Assets | $575.9M | $913.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.18× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $297.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $300.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.9M | $301.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $359.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $323.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $397.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.7M | $412.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $356.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $698.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $702.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.8M | $698.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $767.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $710.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $773.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $282.8M | $768.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $680.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $913.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $904.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $575.9M | $907.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $966.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $910.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $991.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $416.9M | $964.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $869.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-52.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-61.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -71.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 10.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-336.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-52.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-78.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-67.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-103.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-73.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-59.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2M | $-98.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-122.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-61.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-89.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-74.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-109.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-77.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $-98.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-126.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | -71.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -132.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -124.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -222.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -105.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -104.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | -317.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -17685.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 583.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GILT
Segment breakdown not available.
IOVA
| Amtagvi | $64.9M | 75% |
| Proleukin | $21.9M | 25% |
