vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD (GILT) and Millrose Properties, Inc. (MRP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Millrose Properties, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($189.5M vs $152.7M, roughly 1.2× GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD). Millrose Properties, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 64.5% vs 4.1%, a 60.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. is an Israeli public company. It provides satellite-based broadband communications technology, its main expertise being the development, manufacture, and marketing of ground-based satellite systems for global communication via satellites.
Millrose Properties, Inc. is a U.S.-based real estate enterprise primarily focused on the acquisition, ownership, operation, and management of income-generating multi-family residential assets. Its core markets span the U.S. Mid-Atlantic and Southeast regions, and it also offers professional property management services to select third-party property owners.
GILT vs MRP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $152.7M | $189.5M |
| Net Profit | $6.3M | $122.2M |
| Gross Margin | 35.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.4% | 84.8% |
| Net Margin | 4.1% | 64.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 285.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $57016808.00 | $0.74 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $189.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $179.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.7M | $149.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $82.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.6M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $106.9M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $98.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $122.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $105.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $112.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $39.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-5.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.7% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 29.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 84.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 85.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | 85.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 55.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -4.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 64.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 58.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 75.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -5.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.74 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.63 | ||
| Q2 25 | $57016808.00 | $0.68 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.39 | ||
| Q2 24 | $56622204.00 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $64.9M | $35.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $56.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $315.8M | $5.9B |
| Total Assets | $575.9M | $9.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.18× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $35.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $242.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.9M | $66.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $89.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.7M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $87.4M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $70.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.8M | $5.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $282.8M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $255.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $245.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $575.9M | $8.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $416.9M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $371.6M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $376.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $3.7B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 30.05× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $123.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $109.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.05× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
