vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD (GILT) and Metallus Inc. (MTUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Metallus Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($308.3M vs $152.7M, roughly 2.0× GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD). GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD runs the higher net margin — 4.1% vs 1.8%, a 2.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. is an Israeli public company. It provides satellite-based broadband communications technology, its main expertise being the development, manufacture, and marketing of ground-based satellite systems for global communication via satellites.
GILT vs MTUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $152.7M | $308.3M |
| Net Profit | $6.3M | $5.4M |
| Gross Margin | 35.8% | 8.1% |
| Operating Margin | 5.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 4.1% | 1.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 9.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 315.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $57016808.00 | $0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $308.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $267.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $305.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.7M | $304.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $280.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $240.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $227.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.6M | $294.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-14.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-21.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $4.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.7% | 8.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -10.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 2.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | 1.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $57016808.00 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $56622204.00 | $0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $64.9M | $104.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $56.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $315.8M | $683.0M |
| Total Assets | $575.9M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.18× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $104.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $156.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $191.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.9M | $190.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $180.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $240.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $254.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.7M | $272.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.5M | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $13.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $683.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $686.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $697.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.8M | $690.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $686.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $690.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $712.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $282.8M | $736.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $575.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $416.9M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.01× | 0.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
