vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD (GILT) and Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. (RHLD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($152.7M vs $117.7M, roughly 1.3× Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.). GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD runs the higher net margin — 4.1% vs -1.5%, a 5.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. is an Israeli public company. It provides satellite-based broadband communications technology, its main expertise being the development, manufacture, and marketing of ground-based satellite systems for global communication via satellites.
Resolute Mining Limited is an Australian mining corporation focused on mining operations in Africa. It is currently operating two gold mines: the Syama Gold Mine in Mali and the Mako Gold Mine in Senegal.
GILT vs RHLD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $152.7M | $117.7M |
| Net Profit | $6.3M | $-1.7M |
| Gross Margin | 35.8% | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | 5.4% | 30.2% |
| Net Margin | 4.1% | -1.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $57016808.00 | $-0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $117.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $120.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.7M | $119.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $103.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.6M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $106.9M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $98.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-231.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $-611.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-5.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 55.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 59.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | 57.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 52.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.7% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 29.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | 34.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -4.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | -0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -5.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $57016808.00 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.39 | ||
| Q2 24 | $56622204.00 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $64.9M | $205.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $56.5M | $169.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $315.8M | $6.5M |
| Total Assets | $575.9M | $333.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.18× | 26.03× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $205.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $148.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.9M | $99.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.7M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $87.4M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $70.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $169.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $173.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.5M | $177.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $180.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.8M | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $282.8M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $255.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $245.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $333.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $293.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $575.9M | $253.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $214.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $416.9M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $371.6M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $376.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 26.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.01× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | 18.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $196.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $189.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 160.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $313.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $196.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $59.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $48.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $189.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $58.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $47.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 160.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
