vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD (GILT) and Safehold Inc. (SAFE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($152.7M vs $97.9M, roughly 1.6× Safehold Inc.). Safehold Inc. runs the higher net margin — 28.5% vs 4.1%, a 24.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. is an Israeli public company. It provides satellite-based broadband communications technology, its main expertise being the development, manufacture, and marketing of ground-based satellite systems for global communication via satellites.
SAFE Investment Company Limited is a Chinese sovereign wealth fund based in Hong Kong.
GILT vs SAFE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $152.7M | $97.9M |
| Net Profit | $6.3M | $27.9M |
| Gross Margin | 35.8% | 98.6% |
| Operating Margin | 5.4% | 27.4% |
| Net Margin | 4.1% | 28.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 6.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 7.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $57016808.00 | $0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $97.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $96.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.7M | $93.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $97.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $91.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $90.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.6M | $89.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $93.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $27.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $29.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $29.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $29.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $30.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 98.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 98.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | 99.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 98.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 98.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 98.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.7% | 98.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 98.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 27.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 17.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 26.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 29.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | 33.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 33.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 25 | $57016808.00 | $0.39 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.27 | ||
| Q2 24 | $56622204.00 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.43 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $64.9M | $21.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $56.5M | $4.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $315.8M | $2.4B |
| Total Assets | $575.9M | $7.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.18× | 1.90× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.9M | $13.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.7M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.5M | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.8M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $282.8M | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $575.9M | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $416.9M | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.90× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.89× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.84× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.88× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.01× | 1.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.81× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $47.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.72× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $47.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $28.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $37.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2M | $24.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.83× | 0.83× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GILT
Segment breakdown not available.
SAFE
| Equity Method Investment Nonconsolidated Investee Or Group Of Investees | $60.3M | 62% |
| Other | $33.7M | 34% |
| Stabilized Properties | $3.8M | 4% |
