vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GLOBUS MARITIME LTD (GLBS) and IM Cannabis Corp. (IMCC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GLOBUS MARITIME LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.5M vs $9.3M, roughly 1.0× IM Cannabis Corp.). IM Cannabis Corp. runs the higher net margin — -1.5% vs -19.6%, a 18.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GLOBUS MARITIME LTD posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.2% vs -13.9%).
Globus Maritime Ltd is a global shipping enterprise specializing in ownership, operation and chartering of dry bulk cargo vessels. It transports iron ore, coal, grain and other industrial raw materials across major global trade routes, serving clients in logistics, commodities trading and manufacturing sectors worldwide.
IM Cannabis Corp is a global cannabis enterprise focused on the cultivation, production, distribution and retail of medical and adult-use cannabis products. It runs business across core markets including North America, the European Union and Israel, offering branded cannabis goods, wellness derivatives and related consumer products to medical patients and recreational users.
GLBS vs IMCC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.5M | $9.3M |
| Net Profit | $-1.9M | $-141.6K |
| Gross Margin | — | 27.0% |
| Operating Margin | -4.3% | -2.8% |
| Net Margin | -19.6% | -1.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.2% | -13.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -157.0% | 94.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.09 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $9.5M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.5M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 23 | $7.8M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $19.1M | — |
| Q2 25 | $-1.9M | $-141.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $11.0M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | -2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.2% | -19.5% | ||
| Q2 23 | -17.2% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 57.8% | — |
| Q2 25 | -19.6% | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.5% | -23.4% | ||
| Q2 23 | -14.8% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 57.5% | — |
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $0.53 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $48.3M | $579.6K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $173.1M | $3.0M |
| Total Assets | $309.4M | $30.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $48.3M | $579.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.8M | $511.0K | ||
| Q2 23 | $53.2M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $43.6M | — |
| Q2 25 | $173.1M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $178.9M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | $172.1M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $169.5M | — |
| Q2 25 | $309.4M | $30.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $256.3M | $29.4M | ||
| Q2 23 | $217.3M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $206.2M | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GLBS
| Other | $4.8M | 51% |
| Property Plant And Equipment Subject To Operating Leases | $4.7M | 49% |
IMCC
Segment breakdown not available.
