vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GOLAR LNG LTD (GLNG) and UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ (OLED). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($142.2M vs $122.5M, roughly 1.2× GOLAR LNG LTD). GOLAR LNG LTD runs the higher net margin — 25.7% vs 25.2%, a 0.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GOLAR LNG LTD posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (89.1% vs -14.5%).
Golar LNG owns and operates marine LNG infrastructure. The company had developed Floating LNG liquefaction terminal (FLNG) and Floating Storage and Regasification Unit (FSRU) projects based on the conversion of existing LNG carriers. Front End Engineering and Design (FEED) studies have now been completed for a larger newbuild FLNG solution. Golar is also collaborating with another industry leader to investigate solutions for the floating production of blue and green ammonia as well as carbon ...
Universal Display Corporation is a developer and manufacturer of organic light emitting diode (OLED) technologies and materials, and it is a provider of services to the display and lighting industries.
GLNG vs OLED — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $122.5M | $142.2M |
| Net Profit | $31.5M | $35.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 74.6% |
| Operating Margin | 39.4% | 30.1% |
| Net Margin | 25.7% | 25.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 89.1% | -14.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 190.5% | -44.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $142.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $172.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.5M | $139.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $171.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $166.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $162.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.8M | $161.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $158.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $35.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $66.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.5M | $44.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $67.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $64.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.8M | $66.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $52.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 74.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 76.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 74.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 77.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 77.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 75.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.4% | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.7% | 41.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.7% | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -53.7% | 41.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.76 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $611.2M | $516.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | — |
| Total Assets | $4.7B | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.01× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $516.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $602.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $611.2M | $603.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $525.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $571.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $492.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $732.1M | $551.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $530.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $149.0M | $108.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.73× | 3.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $108.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $149.0M | $97.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $51.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $30.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $34.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.6M | $79.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $67.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $37.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $66.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $57.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 60.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 36.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.03× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.73× | 2.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GLNG
Segment breakdown not available.
OLED
| Material sales | $83.7M | 59% |
| Royalty and license fees | $54.2M | 38% |
| Contract research services | $4.3M | 3% |
