vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gloo Holdings, Inc. (GLOO) and HYDROFARM HOLDINGS GROUP, INC. (HYFM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gloo Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($32.6M vs $25.1M, roughly 1.3× HYDROFARM HOLDINGS GROUP, INC.). Gloo Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -116.9% vs -963.9%, a 847.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. HYDROFARM HOLDINGS GROUP, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-4.3M vs $-63.4M).
Hydrofarm Inc. (HYFM) is an American company specializing in the distribution and manufacture of controlled environment agriculture equipment and supplies.
GLOO vs HYFM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.6M | $25.1M |
| Net Profit | $-38.0M | $-242.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 8.5% |
| Operating Margin | -82.0% | -953.8% |
| Net Margin | -116.9% | -963.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -32.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.2% | -1282.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-6.08 | $-52.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $25.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $29.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $39.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $40.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $37.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $44.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $54.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $54.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-38.0M | $-242.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-16.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-16.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-14.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-17.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-23.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-12.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.2% |
| Q4 25 | -82.0% | -953.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -44.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -34.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -40.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -35.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -16.1% |
| Q4 25 | -116.9% | -963.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -55.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -43.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -35.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -46.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -42.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -23.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-6.08 | $-52.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.51 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.63 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.86 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-5.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.1M | $6.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $176.5M | $50.0K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-444.4M | $-63.3M |
| Total Assets | $206.7M | $123.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | $6.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $26.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $24.2M |
| Q4 25 | $176.5M | $50.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $111.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $111.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $110.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $114.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $114.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $114.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $115.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-444.4M | $-63.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $178.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $195.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $209.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $223.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $243.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $255.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $278.0M |
| Q4 25 | $206.7M | $123.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $369.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $389.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $410.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $426.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $445.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $463.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $494.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.42× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-63.0M | $-4.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-63.4M | $-4.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -194.8% | -17.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 1.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-15.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-63.0M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-37.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-11.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-63.4M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-207.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.7M |
| Q4 25 | -194.8% | -17.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -29.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -6.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.7% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GLOO
| Platform Solutions | $12.7M | 39% |
| Advertising | $11.1M | 34% |
| Marketplace | $3.9M | 12% |
| Midwestern Acquisition | $2.7M | 8% |
| Servant Acquisition | $1.8M | 6% |
HYFM
Segment breakdown not available.
