vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gloo Holdings, Inc. (GLOO) and LAKELAND INDUSTRIES INC (LAKE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LAKELAND INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($47.6M vs $32.6M, roughly 1.5× Gloo Holdings, Inc.). LAKELAND INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — -33.5% vs -116.9%, a 83.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. LAKELAND INDUSTRIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-9.3M vs $-63.4M).
Lakeland Limited is a chain of British kitchenware stores in the United Kingdom. It is still based where it was founded in Windermere in the Lake District, the area the company is named after.
GLOO vs LAKE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.6M | $47.6M |
| Net Profit | $-38.0M | $-16.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 29.7% |
| Operating Margin | -82.0% | -3.4% |
| Net Margin | -116.9% | -33.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 4.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.2% | -18652.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-6.08 | $-1.64 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $47.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $52.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $46.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $46.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $45.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $38.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $36.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $31.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-38.0M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $766.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-18.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $86.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-978.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 29.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 40.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 40.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 39.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 44.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 35.9% |
| Q4 25 | -82.0% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -9.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -22.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -10.6% |
| Q4 25 | -116.9% | -33.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -39.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-6.08 | $-1.64 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.47 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $176.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-444.4M | $134.5M |
| Total Assets | $206.7M | $220.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $27.4M |
| Q4 25 | $176.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-444.4M | $134.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $147.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $143.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $146.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $124.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $124.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $125.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $123.5M |
| Q4 25 | $206.7M | $220.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $226.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $218.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $212.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $201.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $198.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $171.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $153.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-63.0M | $-7.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-63.4M | $-9.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -194.8% | -19.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 2.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-24.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-63.0M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-4.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-8.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $293.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-63.4M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-9.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-173.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.6M |
| Q4 25 | -194.8% | -19.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -10.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -19.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -6.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -98.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GLOO
| Platform Solutions | $12.7M | 39% |
| Advertising | $11.1M | 34% |
| Marketplace | $3.9M | 12% |
| Midwestern Acquisition | $2.7M | 8% |
| Servant Acquisition | $1.8M | 6% |
LAKE
| United State | $21.0M | 44% |
| Disposables | $10.9M | 23% |
| Chemical | $5.0M | 11% |
| Other Foreign | $4.3M | 9% |
| Other | $4.0M | 8% |
| High Performance Wear | $2.4M | 5% |
