vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gloo Holdings, Inc. (GLOO) and Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Montauk Renewables, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($43.4M vs $32.6M, roughly 1.3× Gloo Holdings, Inc.). Montauk Renewables, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.7% vs -116.9%, a 122.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. Montauk Renewables, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-41.1M vs $-63.4M).
Montauk Renewables, Inc. is a US-based renewable energy firm specializing in capturing and converting biogenic methane from landfills and agricultural waste into renewable natural gas (RNG) and low-carbon electricity. It serves utility, commercial, and industrial customers across North America, with operations focused on advancing decarbonization and sustainable energy transition goals.
GLOO vs MNTK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.6M | $43.4M |
| Net Profit | $-38.0M | $2.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -82.0% | -3.8% |
| Net Margin | -116.9% | 5.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 56.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.2% | 129.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-6.08 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $43.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $45.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $45.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $27.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $65.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $43.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $38.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-38.0M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-464.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-712.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 22.8% |
| Q4 25 | -82.0% | -3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -35.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | -116.9% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -30.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-6.08 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.1M | $23.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $176.5M | $126.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-444.4M | $263.1M |
| Total Assets | $206.7M | $435.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.48× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | $23.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $40.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $45.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $42.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $63.3M |
| Q4 25 | $176.5M | $126.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $54.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $57.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $40.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $43.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $46.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $49.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $52.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-444.4M | $263.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $260.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $254.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $258.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $257.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $275.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $255.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $254.3M |
| Q4 25 | $206.7M | $435.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $383.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $382.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $354.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $349.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $374.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $362.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $354.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.21× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-63.0M | $337.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-63.4M | $-41.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -194.8% | -94.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 95.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.14× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-86.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-63.0M | $337.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $724.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $193.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $14.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-63.4M | $-41.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-17.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-25.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-18.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-7.7M |
| Q4 25 | -194.8% | -94.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -37.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -56.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -29.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -42.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -19.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 95.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 65.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 74.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 56.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.73× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GLOO
| Platform Solutions | $12.7M | 39% |
| Advertising | $11.1M | 34% |
| Marketplace | $3.9M | 12% |
| Midwestern Acquisition | $2.7M | 8% |
| Servant Acquisition | $1.8M | 6% |
MNTK
| Natural Gas Environmental Attributes | $28.1M | 65% |
| Natural Gas Commodity | $10.7M | 25% |
| Electric Commodity | $2.7M | 6% |
| Electric Environmental Attributes | $2.0M | 5% |
