vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gloo Holdings, Inc. (GLOO) and SPRUCE POWER HOLDING CORP (SPRU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gloo Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($32.6M vs $24.0M, roughly 1.4× SPRUCE POWER HOLDING CORP). SPRUCE POWER HOLDING CORP runs the higher net margin — -28.6% vs -116.9%, a 88.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. SPRUCE POWER HOLDING CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-3.3M vs $-63.4M).
Spruce Finance is an American consumer finance company specializing in the residential solar finance and efficiency home improvement sectors in the U.S.
GLOO vs SPRU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.6M | $24.0M |
| Net Profit | $-38.0M | $-6.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -82.0% | 9.4% |
| Net Margin | -116.9% | -28.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 20.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.2% | -15.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-6.08 | $-0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $24.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $30.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $33.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $23.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $21.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $22.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-38.0M | $-6.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-860.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-15.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-53.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-8.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 54.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 54.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 51.5% |
| Q4 25 | -82.0% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 26.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -7.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -31.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -173.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -14.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -19.7% |
| Q4 25 | -116.9% | -28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -8.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -64.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -29.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -250.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -38.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -13.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-6.08 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.84 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.88 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.45 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.1M | $54.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $176.5M | $695.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-444.4M | $121.3M |
| Total Assets | $206.7M | $837.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 5.74× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | $54.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $53.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $53.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $61.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $72.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $113.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $116.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $120.6M |
| Q4 25 | $176.5M | $695.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $705.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $717.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $723.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $730.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-444.4M | $121.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $124.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $125.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $130.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $143.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $151.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $204.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $213.0M |
| Q4 25 | $206.7M | $837.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $857.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $862.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $878.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $898.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $806.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $858.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $867.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-63.0M | $-3.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-63.4M | $-3.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -194.8% | -13.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-3.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-63.0M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-9.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-13.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-22.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-63.4M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-9.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-13.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-5.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-22.3M |
| Q4 25 | -194.8% | -13.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -38.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -23.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -121.7% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.4% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GLOO
| Platform Solutions | $12.7M | 39% |
| Advertising | $11.1M | 34% |
| Marketplace | $3.9M | 12% |
| Midwestern Acquisition | $2.7M | 8% |
| Servant Acquisition | $1.8M | 6% |
SPRU
Segment breakdown not available.