vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gloo Holdings, Inc. (GLOO) and Americas Gold & Silver Corp (USAS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gloo Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($32.6M vs $19.1M, roughly 1.7× Americas Gold & Silver Corp). Americas Gold & Silver Corp runs the higher net margin — -82.3% vs -116.9%, a 34.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. Americas Gold & Silver Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-41.3M vs $-63.4M).
Pan American Silver Corporation is a mining company based in Canada with operations in Latin America. The company has mines and other projects in Mexico, Peru, Bolivia, and Argentina.
GLOO vs USAS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.6M | $19.1M |
| Net Profit | $-38.0M | $-15.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.2% |
| Operating Margin | -82.0% | — |
| Net Margin | -116.9% | -82.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -28.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.2% | 2.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-6.08 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $19.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $26.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-38.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-15.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-16.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.6% |
| Q4 25 | -82.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -116.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -82.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -60.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-6.08 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.1M | $39.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $176.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-444.4M | $50.2M |
| Total Assets | $206.7M | $234.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $39.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $176.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-444.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $50.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $53.1M |
| Q4 25 | $206.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $234.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-63.0M | $-12.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-63.4M | $-41.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -194.8% | -216.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 150.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-63.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-63.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-41.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-11.2M |
| Q4 25 | -194.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -216.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -42.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 150.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 51.2% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GLOO
| Platform Solutions | $12.7M | 39% |
| Advertising | $11.1M | 34% |
| Marketplace | $3.9M | 12% |
| Midwestern Acquisition | $2.7M | 8% |
| Servant Acquisition | $1.8M | 6% |
USAS
Segment breakdown not available.