vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gloo Holdings, Inc. (GLOO) and Voyager Technologies, Inc. (VOYG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Voyager Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($39.6M vs $32.6M, roughly 1.2× Gloo Holdings, Inc.). Voyager Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -41.1% vs -116.9%, a 75.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. Voyager Technologies, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-53.8M vs $-63.4M).
GLOO vs VOYG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.6M | $39.6M |
| Net Profit | $-38.0M | $-16.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 15.4% |
| Operating Margin | -82.0% | -60.7% |
| Net Margin | -116.9% | -41.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-6.08 | $-0.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $45.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-38.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-31.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.0% |
| Q4 25 | -82.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -60.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -52.8% |
| Q4 25 | -116.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -68.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-6.08 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.1M | $413.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $176.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-444.4M | $590.9M |
| Total Assets | $206.7M | $727.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $413.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $468.9M |
| Q4 25 | $176.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-444.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $590.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $554.7M |
| Q4 25 | $206.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $727.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $685.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-63.0M | $-15.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-63.4M | $-53.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -194.8% | -135.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 97.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-63.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-15.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-30.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-63.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-53.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-88.8M |
| Q4 25 | -194.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -135.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -194.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 97.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 126.7% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GLOO
| Platform Solutions | $12.7M | 39% |
| Advertising | $11.1M | 34% |
| Marketplace | $3.9M | 12% |
| Midwestern Acquisition | $2.7M | 8% |
| Servant Acquisition | $1.8M | 6% |
VOYG
| US Government | $26.9M | 68% |
| Space Solutions | $11.7M | 30% |
| Other | $1.0M | 3% |
