vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GLOBAL PARTNERS LP (GLP) and Option Care Health, Inc. (OPCH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GLOBAL PARTNERS LP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.6× Option Care Health, Inc.). Option Care Health, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.4% vs 1.1%, a 2.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GLOBAL PARTNERS LP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.0% vs 1.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Option Care Health, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (4.9% CAGR vs 0.2%).
Global Partners LP is an American energy supply company ranked 361 in the 2018 Fortune 500. The company is organized as a master limited partnership, and its operations focus on the importing of petroleum products and marketing them in North America. It wholesales products like crude oil, diesel oil, gasoline, heating oil and kerosene.
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc. is an American health technology company based in Chicago, Illinois. The company, which stylizes its own name as GE HealthCare, operates four divisions: Medical imaging, which includes molecular imaging, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, women’s health screening and X-ray systems; Ultrasound; Patient Care Solutions, which is focused on remote patient monitoring, anesthesia and respiratory care, diagnostic cardiology, and infant care; and Pharmaceutical ...
GLP vs OPCH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $25.1M | $45.3M |
| Gross Margin | 11.9% | 19.4% |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | 5.4% |
| Net Margin | 1.1% | 3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 1.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 5.0% | -3.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.29 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $45.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $25.1M | $58.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.0M | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.2M | $50.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.7M | $46.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.9M | $60.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.9M | $53.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.1M | $53.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.9% | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.1% | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | 19.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | 21.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.4% | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | 20.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 4.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.29 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.28 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $177.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | — |
| Total Assets | $3.9B | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $177.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $232.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $309.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $198.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $171.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $412.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $483.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $376.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.82× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.82× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.79× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.78× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.79× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $101.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $62.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.03× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $193.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $101.0M | $258.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.0M | $139.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $216.3M | $90.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-51.6M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.2M | $36.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.7M | $160.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.3M | $195.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $62.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-678.0K | $130.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.3M | $81.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-69.5M | $-16.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.4M | $25.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $98.4M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.7M | $185.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.0% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.2% | -1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 15.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 0.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.03× | 4.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.66× | 2.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.58× | 1.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.76× | -0.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.82× | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.67× | 2.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.53× | 3.69× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GLP
| Gasoline | $1.0B | 46% |
| Refined Petroleum Products Renewable Fuels Crude Oil And Propane | $884.7M | 40% |
| Commercial Segment | $187.6M | 8% |
| Station Operations | $110.5M | 5% |
OPCH
Segment breakdown not available.
