vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GLOBAL PARTNERS LP (GLP) and Snap-on (SNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GLOBAL PARTNERS LP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.8× Snap-on). Snap-on runs the higher net margin — 21.3% vs 1.1%, a 20.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GLOBAL PARTNERS LP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.0% vs 2.7%). Snap-on produced more free cash flow last quarter ($254.6M vs $62.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Snap-on's revenue compounded faster (2.0% CAGR vs 0.2%).
Global Partners LP is an American energy supply company ranked 361 in the 2018 Fortune 500. The company is organized as a master limited partnership, and its operations focus on the importing of petroleum products and marketing them in North America. It wholesales products like crude oil, diesel oil, gasoline, heating oil and kerosene.
Snap-on Incorporated is an American designer, manufacturer, and marketer of high-end tools and equipment for professional use in the transportation industry, including the automotive, heavy duty, equipment, marine, aviation, and railroad industries. Headquartered in Kenosha, Wisconsin, since 1930, Snap-on also distributes lower-end tools under the brand name Blue-Point. Their primary competitors include Matco, Mac Tools, and Cornwell Tools.
GLP vs SNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $25.1M | $260.7M |
| Gross Margin | 11.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | 27.8% |
| Net Margin | 1.1% | 21.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 5.0% | 1.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $4.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $25.1M | $260.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.0M | $265.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.2M | $250.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.7M | $240.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.9M | $258.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.9M | $251.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.1M | $271.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.6M | $263.5M |
| Q4 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | 28.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 21.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 23.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.3% | 22.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.51 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.83 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.91 |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $101.0M | $268.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $62.2M | $254.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.8% | 20.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.03× | 1.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $193.3M | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $101.0M | $268.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.0M | $277.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $216.3M | $237.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-51.6M | $298.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.2M | $293.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.7M | $274.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.3M | $301.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-182.7M | $348.7M |
| Q4 25 | $62.2M | $254.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-678.0K | $258.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.3M | $217.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-69.5M | $275.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.4M | $275.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $98.4M | $253.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.7M | $277.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-199.3M | $326.9M |
| Q4 25 | 2.8% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.0% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.7% | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.2% | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.0% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 4.03× | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.66× | 1.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.58× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.76× | 1.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.82× | 1.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.67× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.53× | 1.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GLP
| Gasoline | $1.0B | 46% |
| Refined Petroleum Products Renewable Fuels Crude Oil And Propane | $884.7M | 40% |
| Commercial Segment | $187.6M | 8% |
| Station Operations | $110.5M | 5% |
SNA
Segment breakdown not available.
