vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI) and Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hillenbrand, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($550.2M vs $420.0M, roughly 1.3× Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.). Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.0% vs -0.4%, a 57.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.3% vs -22.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (5.0% CAGR vs -16.3%).
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. is a real estate investment trust (REIT) specializing in casino properties, based in Wyomissing, Pennsylvania. It was formed in November 2013 as a corporate spin-off from Penn National Gaming. The company owns 62 casino properties, all of which are leased to other companies.
Hillenbrand, Inc. is a global diversified industrial firm that designs, manufactures, and distributes specialized processing equipment and durable industrial solutions. It serves food & beverage, agriculture, manufacturing, waste management sectors, with operations across North America, Europe, and APAC.
GLPI vs HI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $420.0M | $550.2M |
| Net Profit | $239.4M | $-2.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 33.4% |
| Operating Margin | 79.4% | -2.2% |
| Net Margin | 57.0% | -0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.3% | -22.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 40.5% | -134.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $420.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $407.0M | $550.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $397.6M | $652.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $394.9M | $598.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $395.2M | $715.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.6M | $706.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $385.3M | $837.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $380.6M | $786.6M |
| Q1 26 | $239.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $275.4M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $241.2M | $75.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $151.4M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $165.2M | $-40.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $223.6M | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.7M | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $208.3M | $-248.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 33.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.9% |
| Q1 26 | 79.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 89.3% | -2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 84.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 61.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 65.5% | -6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 79.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 70.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 77.1% | -32.7% |
| Q1 26 | 57.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 67.6% | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.7% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.8% | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 57.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.7% | -31.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.96 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.85 | $1.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.54 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.60 | $-0.58 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.79 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.67 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.77 | $-3.53 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $274.5M | $173.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.0B | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $13.8B | $4.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $274.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $173.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $164.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $162.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $458.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $560.8M | $208.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $560.8M | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $223.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6B | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1B | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | $13.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.9B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.5B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.1B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.1B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8B | $5.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.57× | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.51× | 1.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.63× | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.81× | 1.38× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.74× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.60× | 1.48× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-27.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-31.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -5.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $7.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $-27.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $240.3M | $67.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $293.4M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $252.5M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $-11.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $270.4M | $166.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $252.1M | $45.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-31.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $183.0M | $58.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $272.3M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $239.6M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $-21.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $261.5M | $153.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $245.0M | $29.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.0% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.0% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.6% | -1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 275.3% | -3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 67.9% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.4% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.00× | 0.89× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.94× | -0.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.80× | -1.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.46× | 11.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.21× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GLPI
Segment breakdown not available.
HI
| Transferred At Point In Time | $256.5M | 47% |
| Transferred Over Time | $207.1M | 38% |
| Molding Technology Solutions | $86.6M | 16% |
