vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI) and KFORCE INC (KFRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($420.0M vs $330.4M, roughly 1.3× KFORCE INC). Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.0% vs 2.4%, a 54.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.3% vs 0.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (5.0% CAGR vs -3.7%).
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. is a real estate investment trust (REIT) specializing in casino properties, based in Wyomissing, Pennsylvania. It was formed in November 2013 as a corporate spin-off from Penn National Gaming. The company owns 62 casino properties, all of which are leased to other companies.
Kforce Inc. is a professional staffing and solutions firm headquartered in the United States. It provides skilled professional placements and specialized workforce solutions primarily across technology, finance & accounting, and healthcare segments, serving a wide range of mid-sized to large enterprise clients nationwide.
GLPI vs KFRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $420.0M | $330.4M |
| Net Profit | $239.4M | $7.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 27.3% |
| Operating Margin | 79.4% | 3.6% |
| Net Margin | 57.0% | 2.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.3% | 0.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 40.5% | -2.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.46 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $420.0M | $330.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $407.0M | $332.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $397.6M | $332.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $394.9M | $334.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $395.2M | $330.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.6M | $343.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $385.3M | $353.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $380.6M | $356.3M |
| Q1 26 | $239.4M | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $275.4M | $5.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $241.2M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $151.4M | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $165.2M | $8.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $223.6M | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.7M | $14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $208.3M | $14.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 27.8% |
| Q1 26 | 79.4% | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 89.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 84.8% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 61.3% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 65.5% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 79.1% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 70.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 77.1% | 5.5% |
| Q1 26 | 57.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 67.6% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.7% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 57.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.9% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.7% | 4.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.96 | $0.29 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.85 | $0.63 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.54 | $0.59 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.60 | $0.45 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.79 | $0.60 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.67 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.77 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $274.5M | $1.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.0B | $117.4M |
| Total Assets | $13.8B | $384.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $274.5M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $444.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $560.8M | $349.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $560.8M | $127.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $110.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | $5.0B | $117.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.6B | $124.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6B | $132.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.6B | $134.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | $138.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $154.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $167.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1B | $166.6M |
| Q1 26 | $13.8B | $384.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.9B | $365.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8B | $374.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.5B | $373.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.1B | $368.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.1B | $357.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7B | $369.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8B | $362.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.51× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.81× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.74× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.60× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-7.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -2.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $43.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $19.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $240.3M | $23.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $293.4M | $18.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $252.5M | $249.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $270.4M | $31.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $252.1M | $20.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-7.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $16.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $183.0M | $19.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $272.3M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $239.6M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $20.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $261.5M | $27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $245.0M | $17.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | -2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.0% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.6% | -1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 275.3% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 67.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.4% | 5.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 0.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.10× | 3.82× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.00× | 2.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.94× | 1.76× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.53× | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.80× | 1.97× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.46× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.21× | 1.48× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.