vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI) and SILVERCORP METALS INC (SVM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($420.0M vs $223.8M, roughly 1.9× SILVERCORP METALS INC). Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.0% vs -1.3%, a 58.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, SILVERCORP METALS INC's revenue compounded faster (87.6% CAGR vs 5.0%).
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. is a real estate investment trust (REIT) specializing in casino properties, based in Wyomissing, Pennsylvania. It was formed in November 2013 as a corporate spin-off from Penn National Gaming. The company owns 62 casino properties, all of which are leased to other companies.
Silvercorp Metals Inc. (Silvercorp) is a Canadian-based, China-focused precious metals company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of silver-containing properties.
GLPI vs SVM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $420.0M | $223.8M |
| Net Profit | $239.4M | $-2.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 79.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 57.0% | -1.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 40.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $420.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $407.0M | $223.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $397.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $394.9M | $72.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $395.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.6M | $172.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $385.3M | $114.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $380.6M | $60.0M |
| Q1 26 | $239.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $275.4M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $241.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $151.4M | $28.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $165.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $223.6M | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.7M | $28.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $208.3M | $13.2M |
| Q1 26 | 79.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 89.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 84.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 61.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 65.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 79.1% | 30.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 70.4% | 30.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 77.1% | 30.0% |
| Q1 26 | 57.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 67.6% | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.4% | 39.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 57.4% | 24.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.9% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.7% | 22.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.96 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.85 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.54 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.60 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.79 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.67 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.77 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $274.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.0B | — |
| Total Assets | $13.8B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $274.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $560.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $560.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $13.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.51× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.81× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.74× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.60× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $107.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $107.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $240.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $293.4M | $40.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $252.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $81.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $270.4M | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $252.1M | $28.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $183.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $272.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $239.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $261.5M | $33.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $245.0M | $17.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 275.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 67.9% | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.4% | 28.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 19.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.94× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.80× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.46× | 2.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.21× | 2.19× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.