vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI) and UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC (UTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($420.0M vs $220.8M, roughly 1.9× UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC). Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.0% vs 5.8%, a 51.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.6% vs 6.3%). Over the past eight quarters, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC's revenue compounded faster (9.5% CAGR vs 5.0%).
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. is a real estate investment trust (REIT) specializing in casino properties, based in Wyomissing, Pennsylvania. It was formed in November 2013 as a corporate spin-off from Penn National Gaming. The company owns 62 casino properties, all of which are leased to other companies.
Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) is a private for-profit system of technical colleges in the United States. It was established in 1965 by Robert Sweet.
GLPI vs UTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $420.0M | $220.8M |
| Net Profit | $239.4M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 79.4% | 7.1% |
| Net Margin | 57.0% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.3% | 9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 40.5% | -42.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $420.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $407.0M | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $397.6M | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $394.9M | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $395.2M | $207.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.6M | $201.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $385.3M | $196.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $380.6M | $177.5M |
| Q1 26 | $239.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $275.4M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $241.2M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $151.4M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $165.2M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $223.6M | $22.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.7M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $208.3M | $5.0M |
| Q1 26 | 79.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 89.3% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 84.8% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 61.3% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 65.5% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 79.1% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 70.4% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 77.1% | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | 57.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 67.6% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.7% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.4% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 57.4% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.9% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.7% | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.96 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.85 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.54 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.60 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.79 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.67 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.77 | $0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $274.5M | $162.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $101.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.0B | $335.9M |
| Total Assets | $13.8B | $834.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.30× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $274.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $70.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $560.8M | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $560.8M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $115.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.2B | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9B | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9B | $94.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7B | $120.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | $125.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6B | $137.3M |
| Q1 26 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.6B | $335.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6B | $328.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.6B | $306.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | $293.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $280.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $260.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1B | $239.4M |
| Q1 26 | $13.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.9B | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8B | $826.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.5B | $740.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.1B | $720.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.1B | $753.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7B | $744.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8B | $706.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.56× | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.57× | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.51× | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.63× | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.81× | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.74× | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.60× | 0.57× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $3.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-19.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -8.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 10.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.24× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $16.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $240.3M | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $293.4M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $252.5M | $-789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $270.4M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $252.1M | $10.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $183.0M | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $272.3M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $239.6M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $261.5M | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $245.0M | $3.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.0% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.6% | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 275.3% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 67.9% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.4% | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.4% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 4.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.10× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.00× | 3.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.94× | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.53× | -0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.80× | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.46× | 3.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.21× | 2.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GLPI
Segment breakdown not available.
UTI
| UTI | $142.8M | 65% |
| Concorde | $78.0M | 35% |
