vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GENCO SHIPPING & TRADING LTD (GNK) and Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. (REPX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GENCO SHIPPING & TRADING LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($109.9M vs $97.3M, roughly 1.1× Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.). On growth, GENCO SHIPPING & TRADING LTD posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.8% vs -5.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-1.2% CAGR vs -3.3%).
Genco Shipping & Trading Ltd is a global dry bulk shipping enterprise that operates a diversified fleet of bulk carriers, transporting essential commodities including iron ore, coal, grain, and steel products across major international trade routes, serving industrial, manufacturing, and commodity trading clients worldwide.
Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. is an independent energy company focused on exploration, development, and production of crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids primarily in the US Permian Basin spanning Texas and New Mexico. It prioritizes cost-efficient onshore reserve development to supply reliable energy products to North American markets.
GNK vs REPX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $109.9M | $97.3M |
| Net Profit | $15.4M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 17.3% | 26.9% |
| Net Margin | 14.0% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 10.8% | -5.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.36 | $4.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $109.9M | $97.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.9M | $106.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.9M | $85.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.3M | $102.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $99.2M | $102.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $99.3M | $102.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.0M | $105.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $117.4M | $99.7M |
| Q4 25 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.1M | $16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.8M | $30.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.9M | $28.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.5M | $25.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.5M | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.8M | $18.8M |
| Q4 25 | 17.3% | 26.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 27.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.3% | 33.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.7% | 48.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | 31.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.2% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.6% | 50.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.8% | 50.7% |
| Q4 25 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.3% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.4% | 35.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.7% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.6% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.9% | 31.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.0% | 18.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.36 | $4.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.02 | $0.77 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $1.44 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.28 | $1.36 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $0.52 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.49 | $1.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.54 | $1.59 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.43 | $0.94 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $55.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $247.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $896.5M | $634.2M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.39× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $55.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $48.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $247.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $367.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $275.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $249.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $269.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $288.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $322.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $341.8M |
| Q4 25 | $896.5M | $634.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $885.9M | $566.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $891.6M | $556.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $903.2M | $532.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $926.7M | $510.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $929.9M | $507.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $921.8M | $489.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $915.1M | $434.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $994.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $993.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $997.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $956.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.49× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.79× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.9M | $64.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $15.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.03× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $28.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.9M | $64.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.7M | $63.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4M | $33.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $50.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.0M | $66.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.6M | $72.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.0M | $51.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.3M | $56.1M |
| Q4 25 | $15.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.90× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.76× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.37× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.66× | 2.81× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.24× | 1.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.72× | 2.99× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
