vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Global Net Lease, Inc. (GNL) and PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp (PRCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Global Net Lease, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($117.0M vs $83.1M, roughly 1.4× PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp). Global Net Lease, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 41.2% vs -38.1%, a 79.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.2% vs -15.1%). Over the past eight quarters, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp's revenue compounded faster (24.8% CAGR vs -11.1%).
Global Net Lease, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that acquires, owns and manages a diversified portfolio of commercial real estate assets under long-term net lease contracts. Its property portfolio spans North America and Europe, covering industrial, office, retail and other key sectors, serving tenants across multiple industries to deliver consistent long-term returns for shareholders.
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp is a medical tech firm developing and commercializing robotic surgical solutions for urological care. Its flagship AquaBeam system provides image-guided minimally invasive therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia, serving providers and patients across North America, Europe and global markets.
GNL vs PRCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $117.0M | $83.1M |
| Net Profit | $48.2M | $-31.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 64.9% |
| Operating Margin | 94.7% | -4.1% |
| Net Margin | 41.2% | -38.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -15.1% | 20.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 838.7% | -27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | $-0.56 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $83.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $117.0M | $76.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.0M | $83.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $124.9M | $79.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.4M | $69.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $137.8M | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $138.7M | $58.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $145.5M | $53.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-31.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $48.2M | $-29.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-60.1M | $-21.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.1M | $-19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-189.4M | $-24.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.5M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-65.6M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-35.7M | $-25.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 64.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 64.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 65.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 63.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 64.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 59.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 94.7% | -40.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.7% | -27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.9% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -21.1% | -39.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.8% | -28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | -38.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.6% | -50.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | -38.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.2% | -39.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -49.7% | -25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -19.3% | -24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -143.0% | -35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.7% | -27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -47.3% | -35.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.5% | -48.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.56 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.14 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.32 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.87 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.08 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.33 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.20 | $-0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $180.1M | $245.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $51.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $347.7M |
| Total Assets | $4.3B | $487.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $245.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $180.1M | $286.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $165.1M | $294.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $144.8M | $302.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $147.0M | $316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.7M | $333.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $196.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.2M | $214.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $51.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $51.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $51.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $51.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $51.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $51.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $51.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $347.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $365.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $380.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $385.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $389.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $402.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $241.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $251.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $487.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $508.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $511.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0B | $513.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.8B | $519.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0B | $534.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $374.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6B | $374.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.20× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $222.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.62× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $222.8M | $-10.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.0M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.0M | $-15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $59.2M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $299.5M | $-32.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.1M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.4M | $-15.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-17.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-33.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-19.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-16.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -15.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -11.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -22.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -27.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -49.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -32.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -31.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.62× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GNL
| Industrial And Distribution Segment | $56.0M | 48% |
| Office Segment | $30.8M | 26% |
| Single Tenant Retail Segment | $30.2M | 26% |
PRCT
| Handpieces and other consumables | $43.0M | 52% |
| System sales and rentals | $23.4M | 28% |
| Other | $11.1M | 13% |
| Service | $5.6M | 7% |
