vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Genasys Inc. (GNSS) and Horizon Technology Finance Corp (HTFB), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Genasys Inc. is based in San Diego, California. Its long-range acoustic device (LRAD) products are used for long-range acoustic hailing and mass notification. Its software-as-a-service products Genasys Protect and Evertel are used for zone-based multi-channel communication and secure messaging and collaboration, respectively. Genasys Acoustics are integrated speakers used to send long range voice broadcasts. The company was previously named American Technology Corporation (ATC) until 2010 and...
TCL Technology Group Corp. is a Chinese partially state-owned electronics company headquartered in Huizhou, Guangdong province. TCL develops, manufactures, and sells consumer electronics like television sets, mobile phones, air conditioners, washing machines, refrigerators, and small electrical appliances. In 2010, it was the world's 25th-largest consumer electronics producer. On 7 February 2020, TCL Corporation changed its name to TCL Technology. It was the second-largest television manufact...
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $17.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-817.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 48.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 37.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -60.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -90.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -85.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -105.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -74.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -121.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -4.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -65.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -88.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -58.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -168.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -93.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -120.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.26 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.16 | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
