vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gold.com, Inc. (GOLD) and Merck & Co. (MRK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Merck & Co. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($16.3B vs $10.4B, roughly 1.6× Gold.com, Inc.). Merck & Co. runs the higher net margin — 0.9% vs 0.6%, a 0.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gold.com, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (244.0% vs 4.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Gold.com, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (95.3% CAGR vs 0.5%).
Kinross Gold Corporation is a Canadian-based gold and silver mining company founded in 1993 and headquartered in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Kinross currently operates six active gold mines, and was ranked fifth of the "10 Top Gold-mining Companies" of 2019 by InvestingNews. The company's mines are located in Brazil, Mauritania, and the United States. It trades under the KGC ticker in the New York Stock Exchange, and under K in the Toronto Stock Exchange.
Merck & Co., Inc. is an American multinational pharmaceutical company headquartered in Rahway, New Jersey. The company does business as Merck Sharp & Dohme or MSD outside the United States and Canada. The company is ranked fourth on the list of largest biomedical companies by revenue.
GOLD vs MRK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2027 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $10.4B | $16.3B |
| Net Profit | $59.5M | $141.0M |
| Gross Margin | 1.7% | 74.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 0.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 244.0% | 4.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 411.2% | -9.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.09 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 26 | $10.4B | — | ||
| Q2 26 | $6.5B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $16.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $148.1M | $16.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $17.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $15.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $15.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $15.6B |
| Q3 26 | $59.5M | — | ||
| Q2 26 | $11.6M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $141.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.6M | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-939.0K | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.3M | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.5M | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $3.7B |
| Q3 26 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 26 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 74.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 63.0% | 66.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 77.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 77.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 78.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 75.5% |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.0% | 39.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.3% | 38.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 26.7% |
| Q3 26 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 26 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.9% | 18.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.0% | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.3% | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 24.0% |
| Q3 26 | $2.09 | — | ||
| Q2 26 | $0.46 | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.46 | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.04 | $2.32 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.43 | $1.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.36 | $2.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.27 | $1.49 |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $153.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.57× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 26 | $153.0M | — | ||
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-42.6M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $195.4M | $7.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.0M | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $102.8M | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $110.1M | $3.5B |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-46.6M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $193.4M | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.1M | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $100.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.4M | $2.5B |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -31.5% | 11.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 39.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 16.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 16.1% |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 8.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 6.0% |
| Q3 26 | 2.57× | — | ||
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.66× | 0.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.49× | 0.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.49× | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.78× | 0.92× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
