vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) and HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Acushnet Holdings Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($477.2M vs $270.8M, roughly 1.8× HUTCHMED (China) Ltd). HUTCHMED (China) Ltd runs the higher net margin — 0.7% vs -7.3%, a 8.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Acushnet Holdings Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.2% vs -16.5%). HUTCHMED (China) Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.4M vs $-23.3M).
The Acushnet Company is an American company focused on the golf market. The company operates a series of brands that manufacture golf equipment, clothing and accessories.
HUTCHMED (China) LtdHCMEarnings & Financial Report
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on discovering, developing and commercializing targeted and immunotherapies for oncology and immunological diseases. It operates across China and global markets, with multiple marketed oncology drugs and a robust pipeline of late-stage clinical candidates addressing unmet patient needs.
GOLF vs HCM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $477.2M | $270.8M |
| Net Profit | $-34.9M | $2.0M |
| Gross Margin | 44.1% | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | -3.8% | -13.2% |
| Net Margin | -7.3% | 0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.2% | -16.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3027.3% | -83.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.57 | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $477.2M | $270.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $657.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $720.5M | $277.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $703.4M | $324.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $445.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $620.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $683.9M | $305.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $707.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-34.9M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $75.6M | $455.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.4M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $56.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $71.4M | $25.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $87.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 44.1% | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.9% | 48.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.4% | 41.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 53.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -3.8% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.2% | -1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.3% | -5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.5% | -9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.5% | 163.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.1% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.57 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.81 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.25 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.62 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.89 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.11 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.35 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $926.2M | $93.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $783.6M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.18× | 0.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $836.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $802.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $926.2M | $93.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $93.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $82.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $753.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $82.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $783.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $852.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $808.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $780.3M | $759.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $765.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $863.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $863.7M | $740.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $883.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.18× | 0.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-338.0K | $8.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-23.3M | $3.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -4.9% | 1.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.8% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $120.0M | $-96.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-338.0K | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $163.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $151.9M | $-72.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-120.3M | $40.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $211.6M | $-39.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-109.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-23.3M | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $136.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $138.0M | $-82.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-131.5M | $32.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-33.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $123.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $196.8M | $-49.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-116.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | -4.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.2% | -29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -18.7% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.8% | -16.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.01× | -0.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.21× | 3.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.56× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.96× | -1.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.25× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GOLF
| Titleist Golf Equipment | $293.8M | 62% |
| Footjoy Golf Wear | $102.0M | 21% |
| Other | $45.3M | 9% |
| Golf Gear | $36.1M | 8% |
HCM
Segment breakdown not available.
