vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP (GOOD) and Integra Resources Corp. (ITRG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Integra Resources Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($57.0M vs $41.9M, roughly 1.4× GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP). GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 16.6% vs -9.6%, a 26.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Gladstone Commercial Corp is a publicly traded US real estate investment trust focused on acquiring, owning, and operating diversified industrial and commercial properties. It offers long-term net lease agreements to tenants across manufacturing, logistics, healthcare and professional services sectors, mainly serving small to mid-sized business clients.
Integra Resources Corp is a mineral exploration and development firm focused on advancing high-potential gold and silver projects. It primarily operates in the western United States, conducting geological surveys, resource assessment, and feasibility studies to unlock value from precious metal deposits while adhering to sustainable operational standards.
GOOD vs ITRG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $41.9M | $57.0M |
| Net Profit | $7.0M | $-5.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 160.2% | — |
| Net Margin | 16.6% | -9.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 29.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $41.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $43.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.5M | $57.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.1M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | 160.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 16.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.7% | -9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
