vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP (GOOD) and MESA LABORATORIES INC (MLAB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

MESA LABORATORIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($65.1M vs $43.5M, roughly 1.5× GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP). GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 12.4% vs 5.6%, a 6.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.3% vs 3.6%). Over the past eight quarters, GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (10.3% CAGR vs 5.1%).

Gladstone Commercial Corp is a publicly traded US real estate investment trust focused on acquiring, owning, and operating diversified industrial and commercial properties. It offers long-term net lease agreements to tenants across manufacturing, logistics, healthcare and professional services sectors, mainly serving small to mid-sized business clients.

Mesa Laboratories Inc. develops, manufactures and sells professional quality control, calibration and monitoring instruments as well as related supporting services. Its core offerings cater to healthcare, pharmaceutical, food and beverage, industrial hygiene and environmental testing markets, helping global clients meet regulatory compliance and operational safety requirements.

GOOD vs MLAB — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
MLAB
MLAB
1.5× larger
MLAB
$65.1M
$43.5M
GOOD
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
GOOD
GOOD
+12.6% gap
GOOD
16.3%
3.6%
MLAB
Higher net margin
GOOD
GOOD
6.8% more per $
GOOD
12.4%
5.6%
MLAB
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
GOOD
GOOD
Annualised
GOOD
10.3%
5.1%
MLAB

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
GOOD
GOOD
MLAB
MLAB
Revenue
$43.5M
$65.1M
Net Profit
$5.4M
$3.6M
Gross Margin
64.2%
Operating Margin
12.2%
Net Margin
12.4%
5.6%
Revenue YoY
16.3%
3.6%
Net Profit YoY
-25.1%
316.6%
EPS (diluted)
$0.05
$0.65

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GOOD
GOOD
MLAB
MLAB
Q4 25
$43.5M
$65.1M
Q3 25
$40.8M
$60.7M
Q2 25
$39.5M
$59.5M
Q1 25
$37.5M
$62.1M
Q4 24
$37.4M
$62.8M
Q3 24
$39.2M
$57.8M
Q2 24
$37.1M
$58.2M
Q1 24
$35.7M
$58.9M
Net Profit
GOOD
GOOD
MLAB
MLAB
Q4 25
$5.4M
$3.6M
Q3 25
$4.1M
$2.5M
Q2 25
$4.6M
$4.7M
Q1 25
$5.1M
$-7.1M
Q4 24
$7.2M
$-1.7M
Q3 24
$11.7M
$3.4M
Q2 24
$1.6M
$3.4M
Q1 24
$3.5M
$-254.6M
Gross Margin
GOOD
GOOD
MLAB
MLAB
Q4 25
64.2%
Q3 25
61.5%
Q2 25
62.0%
Q1 25
61.8%
Q4 24
63.3%
Q3 24
61.3%
Q2 24
64.0%
Q1 24
62.1%
Operating Margin
GOOD
GOOD
MLAB
MLAB
Q4 25
12.2%
Q3 25
7.8%
Q2 25
5.1%
Q1 25
2.4%
Q4 24
9.2%
Q3 24
6.1%
Q2 24
9.6%
Q1 24
-460.6%
Net Margin
GOOD
GOOD
MLAB
MLAB
Q4 25
12.4%
5.6%
Q3 25
10.1%
4.1%
Q2 25
11.7%
8.0%
Q1 25
13.7%
-11.4%
Q4 24
19.2%
-2.7%
Q3 24
29.8%
5.9%
Q2 24
4.3%
5.8%
Q1 24
9.9%
-432.2%
EPS (diluted)
GOOD
GOOD
MLAB
MLAB
Q4 25
$0.05
$0.65
Q3 25
$0.02
$0.45
Q2 25
$0.03
$0.85
Q1 25
$0.04
$-1.30
Q4 24
$0.10
$-0.31
Q3 24
$0.20
$0.63
Q2 24
$-0.04
$0.62
Q1 24
$0.01
$-47.26

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GOOD
GOOD
MLAB
MLAB
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$10.8M
$29.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$843.5M
$68.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$171.8M
$186.7M
Total Assets
$1.2B
$434.8M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
4.91×
0.37×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GOOD
GOOD
MLAB
MLAB
Q4 25
$10.8M
$29.0M
Q3 25
$18.4M
$20.4M
Q2 25
$11.7M
$21.3M
Q1 25
$10.4M
$27.3M
Q4 24
$11.0M
$27.3M
Q3 24
$10.5M
$24.3M
Q2 24
$10.4M
$28.5M
Q1 24
$10.5M
$28.2M
Total Debt
GOOD
GOOD
MLAB
MLAB
Q4 25
$843.5M
$68.4M
Q3 25
$843.3M
$69.4M
Q2 25
$794.4M
$70.3M
Q1 25
$740.7M
$71.3M
Q4 24
$693.4M
$72.2M
Q3 24
$692.6M
$73.1M
Q2 24
$722.5M
$74.1M
Q1 24
$719.4M
Stockholders' Equity
GOOD
GOOD
MLAB
MLAB
Q4 25
$171.8M
$186.7M
Q3 25
$184.8M
$178.5M
Q2 25
$177.2M
$172.5M
Q1 25
$183.2M
$159.8M
Q4 24
$171.2M
$155.2M
Q3 24
$168.9M
$161.5M
Q2 24
$145.7M
$150.7M
Q1 24
$147.3M
$145.4M
Total Assets
GOOD
GOOD
MLAB
MLAB
Q4 25
$1.2B
$434.8M
Q3 25
$1.3B
$430.4M
Q2 25
$1.2B
$435.7M
Q1 25
$1.2B
$433.3M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$433.3M
Q3 24
$1.1B
$454.1M
Q2 24
$1.1B
$440.4M
Q1 24
$1.1B
$446.8M
Debt / Equity
GOOD
GOOD
MLAB
MLAB
Q4 25
4.91×
0.37×
Q3 25
4.56×
0.39×
Q2 25
4.48×
0.41×
Q1 25
4.04×
0.45×
Q4 24
4.05×
0.47×
Q3 24
4.10×
0.45×
Q2 24
4.96×
0.49×
Q1 24
4.88×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GOOD
GOOD
MLAB
MLAB
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$88.2M
$18.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$18.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
27.7%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
16.38×
5.17×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$37.9M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GOOD
GOOD
MLAB
MLAB
Q4 25
$88.2M
$18.8M
Q3 25
$18.9M
$8.2M
Q2 25
$35.8M
$1.9M
Q1 25
$17.7M
$12.7M
Q4 24
$57.0M
$18.1M
Q3 24
$5.5M
$5.3M
Q2 24
$13.6M
$10.7M
Q1 24
$15.0M
$12.9M
Free Cash Flow
GOOD
GOOD
MLAB
MLAB
Q4 25
$18.0M
Q3 25
$7.1M
Q2 25
$884.0K
Q1 25
$11.9M
Q4 24
$17.3M
Q3 24
$3.5M
Q2 24
$9.9M
Q1 24
$12.3M
FCF Margin
GOOD
GOOD
MLAB
MLAB
Q4 25
27.7%
Q3 25
11.7%
Q2 25
1.5%
Q1 25
19.2%
Q4 24
27.6%
Q3 24
6.0%
Q2 24
16.9%
Q1 24
21.0%
Capex Intensity
GOOD
GOOD
MLAB
MLAB
Q4 25
1.1%
Q3 25
1.8%
Q2 25
1.7%
Q1 25
1.2%
Q4 24
1.3%
Q3 24
3.1%
Q2 24
1.5%
Q1 24
0.9%
Cash Conversion
GOOD
GOOD
MLAB
MLAB
Q4 25
16.38×
5.17×
Q3 25
4.57×
3.32×
Q2 25
7.74×
0.40×
Q1 25
3.44×
Q4 24
7.93×
Q3 24
0.47×
1.54×
Q2 24
8.44×
3.17×
Q1 24
4.26×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

GOOD
GOOD

Segment breakdown not available.

MLAB
MLAB

Sterilization And Disinfection Control$24.9M38%
Biopharmaceutical Development$14.4M22%
Other$14.1M22%
Clinical Genomics$11.8M18%

Related Comparisons