vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP (GOOD) and RxSight, Inc. (RXST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($43.5M vs $32.6M, roughly 1.3× RxSight, Inc.). GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 12.4% vs -28.1%, a 40.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.3% vs -18.9%). Over the past eight quarters, GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (10.3% CAGR vs 5.1%).
Gladstone Commercial Corp is a publicly traded US real estate investment trust focused on acquiring, owning, and operating diversified industrial and commercial properties. It offers long-term net lease agreements to tenants across manufacturing, logistics, healthcare and professional services sectors, mainly serving small to mid-sized business clients.
RxSight, Inc. is a medical technology company focused on developing and commercializing innovative intraocular lens solutions for patients undergoing cataract and refractive lens exchange procedures. Its flagship Light Adjustable Lens allows post-surgery power adjustment via a dedicated light delivery device, serving global ophthalmology care markets to improve post-operative visual outcomes for patients.
GOOD vs RXST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $43.5M | $32.6M |
| Net Profit | $5.4M | $-9.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 77.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | -34.8% |
| Net Margin | 12.4% | -28.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 16.3% | -18.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -25.1% | -54.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $-0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $43.5M | $32.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.8M | $30.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.5M | $33.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.5M | $37.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.4M | $40.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.2M | $35.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.1M | $34.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.7M | $29.5M |
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.6M | $-11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.1M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.7M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5M | $-9.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 77.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 79.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 74.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 71.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 71.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 70.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -34.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -41.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -28.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -21.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -26.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -36.2% |
| Q4 25 | 12.4% | -28.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | -32.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.7% | -35.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.7% | -21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.2% | -14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.8% | -17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | -17.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.9% | -30.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.05 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.02 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.10 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $-0.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.8M | $228.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $843.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $171.8M | $275.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $311.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 4.91× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.8M | $228.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.4M | $227.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.7M | $227.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.4M | $229.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.0M | $237.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.5M | $237.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4M | $233.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.5M | $125.4M |
| Q4 25 | $843.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $843.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $794.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $740.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $693.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $692.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $722.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $719.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $171.8M | $275.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $184.8M | $276.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.2M | $278.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $183.2M | $279.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $171.2M | $281.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $168.9M | $277.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $145.7M | $275.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $147.3M | $163.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $311.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $308.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $309.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $313.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $318.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $310.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $305.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $183.2M |
| Q4 25 | 4.91× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.56× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.48× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.04× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.10× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.96× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.88× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $88.2M | $-1.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-2.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -6.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 16.38× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-19.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $88.2M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.9M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.8M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.7M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.0M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $650.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.6M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.0M | $-9.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-453.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-11.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | -6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -38.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.7% |
| Q4 25 | 16.38× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.74× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.93× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.44× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.26× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GOOD
Segment breakdown not available.
RXST
| Rxlal | $28.2M | 86% |
| LDD | $3.0M | 9% |
| Service Warranty Service Contracts And Accessories | $1.5M | 4% |
