vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP (GOOD) and Snail, Inc. (SNAL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($41.9M vs $25.1M, roughly 1.7× Snail, Inc.). GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 16.6% vs -3.4%, a 20.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-3.6% vs -4.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Snail, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (33.4% CAGR vs 6.3%).
Gladstone Commercial Corp is a publicly traded US real estate investment trust focused on acquiring, owning, and operating diversified industrial and commercial properties. It offers long-term net lease agreements to tenants across manufacturing, logistics, healthcare and professional services sectors, mainly serving small to mid-sized business clients.
Suzhou Snail Digital Technology Co., Ltd., doing business as Snail, is a Chinese video game company and a Virtual Network Operator headquartered in Suzhou, China, which has branches Snail Games and Snail Mobile. Its division, Snail USA, markets Snail Games products in North America, South America, & Europe. Snail Games products include massively multiplayer online (MMOs), real-time strategy (RTS), and casual games. Its global registered user base has reached over 70 million accounts. The U.S....
GOOD vs SNAL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $41.9M | $25.1M |
| Net Profit | $7.0M | $-862.2K |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.3% |
| Operating Margin | 160.2% | -6.0% |
| Net Margin | 16.6% | -3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.6% | -4.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 29.5% | -177.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $41.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $43.5M | $25.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.8M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.5M | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.5M | $20.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.4M | $26.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.2M | $22.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.1M | $21.6M |
| Q1 26 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $-862.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.6M | $-16.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.1M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.7M | $235.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $2.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 37.5% |
| Q1 26 | 160.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -71.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -20.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.4% |
| Q1 26 | 16.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.4% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.1% | -56.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.7% | -74.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.7% | -9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.2% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 10.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.10 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $8.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $14.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $-16.4M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $59.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.8M | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.4M | $12.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.7M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.4M | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.0M | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.5M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4M | $15.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $843.5M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $843.3M | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $794.4M | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $740.7M | $9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $693.4M | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $692.6M | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $722.5M | $5.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $171.8M | $-16.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $184.8M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.2M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $183.2M | $9.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $171.2M | $9.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $168.9M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $145.7M | $7.9M |
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $59.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $51.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $64.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $62.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $66.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $75.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.91× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.56× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.48× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.04× | 0.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.05× | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.10× | 0.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.96× | 0.73× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-5.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $88.2M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.9M | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.8M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.7M | $764.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.0M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.6M | $206.6K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.38× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.74× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.93× | -3.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.47× | -21.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.44× | 0.09× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GOOD
Segment breakdown not available.
SNAL
| Pc | $14.7M | 59% |
| Platform Three | $5.2M | 21% |
| Platform Two | $3.3M | 13% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer Mobile Sale | $1.6M | 6% |
