vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP (GOOD) and WINMARK CORP (WINA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($41.9M vs $21.1M, roughly 2.0× WINMARK CORP). WINMARK CORP runs the higher net margin — 47.2% vs 16.6%, a 30.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WINMARK CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.9% vs -3.6%). Over the past eight quarters, GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (6.3% CAGR vs 2.4%).

Gladstone Commercial Corp is a publicly traded US real estate investment trust focused on acquiring, owning, and operating diversified industrial and commercial properties. It offers long-term net lease agreements to tenants across manufacturing, logistics, healthcare and professional services sectors, mainly serving small to mid-sized business clients.

Winmark Corporation is an American franchisor of five retail businesses that specialize in buying and selling used goods. The company is based in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Winmark was founded in 1988 as Play It Again Sports Franchise Corporation by Ron Olson and Jeffrey Dahlberg after they purchased the Play It Again Sports franchise rights from Martha Morris. They renamed the company to Grow Biz International Inc. in June 1993. Grow Biz went public in August 1993. In 2000, John Morgan replaced...

GOOD vs WINA — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
GOOD
GOOD
2.0× larger
GOOD
$41.9M
$21.1M
WINA
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
WINA
WINA
+11.4% gap
WINA
7.9%
-3.6%
GOOD
Higher net margin
WINA
WINA
30.6% more per $
WINA
47.2%
16.6%
GOOD
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
GOOD
GOOD
Annualised
GOOD
6.3%
2.4%
WINA

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
GOOD
GOOD
WINA
WINA
Revenue
$41.9M
$21.1M
Net Profit
$7.0M
$10.0M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
160.2%
61.7%
Net Margin
16.6%
47.2%
Revenue YoY
-3.6%
7.9%
Net Profit YoY
29.5%
3.9%
EPS (diluted)
$2.68

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GOOD
GOOD
WINA
WINA
Q1 26
$41.9M
Q4 25
$43.5M
$21.1M
Q3 25
$40.8M
$22.6M
Q2 25
$39.5M
$20.4M
Q1 25
$37.5M
$21.9M
Q4 24
$37.4M
$19.5M
Q3 24
$39.2M
$21.5M
Q2 24
$37.1M
$20.1M
Net Profit
GOOD
GOOD
WINA
WINA
Q1 26
$7.0M
Q4 25
$5.4M
$10.0M
Q3 25
$4.1M
$11.1M
Q2 25
$4.6M
$10.6M
Q1 25
$5.1M
$10.0M
Q4 24
$7.2M
$9.6M
Q3 24
$11.7M
$11.1M
Q2 24
$1.6M
$10.4M
Operating Margin
GOOD
GOOD
WINA
WINA
Q1 26
160.2%
Q4 25
61.7%
Q3 25
65.9%
Q2 25
64.0%
Q1 25
62.0%
Q4 24
65.3%
Q3 24
69.4%
Q2 24
64.7%
Net Margin
GOOD
GOOD
WINA
WINA
Q1 26
16.6%
Q4 25
12.4%
47.2%
Q3 25
10.1%
49.2%
Q2 25
11.7%
51.9%
Q1 25
13.7%
45.4%
Q4 24
19.2%
49.0%
Q3 24
29.8%
51.7%
Q2 24
4.3%
51.8%
EPS (diluted)
GOOD
GOOD
WINA
WINA
Q1 26
Q4 25
$0.05
$2.68
Q3 25
$0.02
$3.02
Q2 25
$0.03
$2.89
Q1 25
$0.04
$2.71
Q4 24
$0.10
$2.60
Q3 24
$0.20
$3.03
Q2 24
$-0.04
$2.85

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GOOD
GOOD
WINA
WINA
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$10.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-53.7M
Total Assets
$1.2B
$24.9M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GOOD
GOOD
WINA
WINA
Q1 26
Q4 25
$10.8M
$10.3M
Q3 25
$18.4M
$39.7M
Q2 25
$11.7M
$28.8M
Q1 25
$10.4M
$21.8M
Q4 24
$11.0M
$12.2M
Q3 24
$10.5M
$37.2M
Q2 24
$10.4M
$29.4M
Total Debt
GOOD
GOOD
WINA
WINA
Q1 26
Q4 25
$843.5M
Q3 25
$843.3M
Q2 25
$794.4M
Q1 25
$740.7M
Q4 24
$693.4M
Q3 24
$692.6M
Q2 24
$722.5M
Stockholders' Equity
GOOD
GOOD
WINA
WINA
Q1 26
Q4 25
$171.8M
$-53.7M
Q3 25
$184.8M
$-26.3M
Q2 25
$177.2M
$-36.8M
Q1 25
$183.2M
$-45.9M
Q4 24
$171.2M
$-51.0M
Q3 24
$168.9M
$-33.7M
Q2 24
$145.7M
$-42.2M
Total Assets
GOOD
GOOD
WINA
WINA
Q1 26
$1.2B
Q4 25
$1.2B
$24.9M
Q3 25
$1.3B
$53.7M
Q2 25
$1.2B
$43.2M
Q1 25
$1.2B
$37.1M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$26.8M
Q3 24
$1.1B
$52.0M
Q2 24
$1.1B
$44.7M
Debt / Equity
GOOD
GOOD
WINA
WINA
Q1 26
Q4 25
4.91×
Q3 25
4.56×
Q2 25
4.48×
Q1 25
4.04×
Q4 24
4.05×
Q3 24
4.10×
Q2 24
4.96×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GOOD
GOOD
WINA
WINA
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$8.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$8.5M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
40.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.86×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$44.7M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GOOD
GOOD
WINA
WINA
Q1 26
Q4 25
$88.2M
$8.5M
Q3 25
$18.9M
$12.3M
Q2 25
$35.8M
$9.0M
Q1 25
$17.7M
$15.1M
Q4 24
$57.0M
$8.5M
Q3 24
$5.5M
$12.1M
Q2 24
$13.6M
$8.2M
Free Cash Flow
GOOD
GOOD
WINA
WINA
Q1 26
Q4 25
$8.5M
Q3 25
$12.2M
Q2 25
$9.0M
Q1 25
$15.0M
Q4 24
Q3 24
$12.1M
Q2 24
$8.1M
FCF Margin
GOOD
GOOD
WINA
WINA
Q1 26
Q4 25
40.3%
Q3 25
53.8%
Q2 25
44.0%
Q1 25
68.6%
Q4 24
Q3 24
56.3%
Q2 24
40.4%
Capex Intensity
GOOD
GOOD
WINA
WINA
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.1%
Q3 25
0.3%
Q2 25
0.3%
Q1 25
0.2%
Q4 24
0.0%
Q3 24
0.0%
Q2 24
0.5%
Cash Conversion
GOOD
GOOD
WINA
WINA
Q1 26
Q4 25
16.38×
0.86×
Q3 25
4.57×
1.10×
Q2 25
7.74×
0.85×
Q1 25
3.44×
1.51×
Q4 24
7.93×
0.88×
Q3 24
0.47×
1.09×
Q2 24
8.44×
0.79×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons