vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gossamer Bio, Inc. (GOSS) and Massimo Group (MAMO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Massimo Group is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($21.0M vs $13.8M, roughly 1.5× Gossamer Bio, Inc.). Massimo Group runs the higher net margin — 9.5% vs -342.3%, a 351.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gossamer Bio, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (47.1% vs 15.7%).
Gossamer Bio, Inc. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering, developing and commercializing novel therapeutics for patients with serious immunology, inflammation and oncology conditions. It advances a pipeline of proprietary product candidates across multiple clinical phases, primarily serving healthcare markets in North America and other global regions.
Massimo Dutti, S.A. is a Spanish premium clothing retailer specializing in cashmere and wool products, established in 1985 and owned by Spanish multinational company Inditex, the parent company of Zara, Pull&Bear, and other brands.
GOSS vs MAMO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.8M | $21.0M |
| Net Profit | $-47.2M | $2.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.5% |
| Operating Margin | -333.6% | 13.1% |
| Net Margin | -342.3% | 9.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 47.1% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -43.0% | 215.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.21 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.8M | $21.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3M | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $95.8M | $35.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $0 | $30.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-47.2M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-48.2M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $77.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.2M | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-41.9M | $3.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 34.7% |
| Q4 25 | -333.6% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -369.4% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -18.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -15.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.3% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.2% |
| Q4 25 | -342.3% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -362.7% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 51.4% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.21 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.21 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.22 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.19 | $0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $136.9M | $5.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-122.8M | $23.7M |
| Total Assets | $172.2M | $51.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $136.9M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $180.2M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $354.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $244.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-122.8M | $23.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-82.3M | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $20.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $19.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $81.5M | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.7M | $18.1M |
| Q4 25 | $172.2M | $51.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $208.8M | $44.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $45.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $46.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $54.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $373.4M | $49.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $259.4M | $47.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-48.3M | $4.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.01× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-48.3M | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-36.2M | $633.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.3M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-52.3M | $-637.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-6.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-741.4K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 49.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -19.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -17.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.36× | -2.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.20× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
