vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GREENPOWER MOTOR Co INC. (GP) and Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd (MATH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($12.0M vs $7.2M, roughly 1.7× GREENPOWER MOTOR Co INC.). Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd runs the higher net margin — -24.0% vs -65.6%, a 41.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GREENPOWER MOTOR Co INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-11.5% vs -39.0%).
GreenPower Motor Company Inc. is a Canadian electric bus manufacturer and distributor in North America. The company fabricates multiple zero-emission models, including transit buses, school buses, and double decker buses. GreenPower headquarters are in Vancouver, British Columbia, with a sales office in Rancho Cucamonga, California; an assembly facility in Porterville, California; and a production facility in South Charleston, West Virginia. Its stock is traded on Nasdaq the United States.
Metalpha Technology Holding LtdMATHEarnings & Financial Report
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd is a global fintech firm specializing in digital asset wealth management, institutional-grade crypto investment services, and Web3 ecosystem infrastructure support. It serves professional investors, financial institutions, and high-net-worth clients across Asia, North America and Europe, with core segments including structured digital asset products, risk management solutions and DeFi technology development.
GP vs MATH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.2M | $12.0M |
| Net Profit | $-4.7M | $-2.9M |
| Gross Margin | 14.6% | 28.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -24.2% |
| Net Margin | -65.6% | -24.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -11.5% | -39.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -2.1% | -147.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.17 | $-0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $24.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3M | $19.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $8.2M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $17.6M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.7M | $6.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.4M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-4.6M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-4.3M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-2.8M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 28.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 85.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.6% | 49.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 16.6% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 15.9% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -24.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -65.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -87.9% | 30.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -179.8% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -56.9% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -50.4% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -16.0% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.17 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.18 | $0.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.21 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-0.19 | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-0.17 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-0.11 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $621.1K | $10.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $101.2K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.1M | $35.1M |
| Total Assets | $37.4M | $413.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $10.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $621.1K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.9K | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $528.3K | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $1.5M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $101.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $188.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $275.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $35.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $36.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.6M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $18.1M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $22.3M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $26.2M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $413.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $246.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.4M | $237.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.5M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $50.2M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.1M | $3.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.3M | $-16.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.2M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-5.4M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $7.8M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
