vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of GREENPOWER MOTOR Co INC. (GP) and Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. (SUNS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

GREENPOWER MOTOR Co INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.2M vs $5.2M, roughly 1.4× Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.). Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 31.2% vs -65.6%, a 96.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.

GreenPower Motor Company Inc. is a Canadian electric bus manufacturer and distributor in North America. The company fabricates multiple zero-emission models, including transit buses, school buses, and double decker buses. GreenPower headquarters are in Vancouver, British Columbia, with a sales office in Rancho Cucamonga, California; an assembly facility in Porterville, California; and a production facility in South Charleston, West Virginia. Its stock is traded on Nasdaq the United States.

Namdar Realty Group is a private, family-owned real estate investment trust based in Great Neck, New York. As of 2021, the company owns over 400 properties.

GP vs SUNS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
GP
GP
1.4× larger
GP
$7.2M
$5.2M
SUNS
Higher net margin
SUNS
SUNS
96.8% more per $
SUNS
31.2%
-65.6%
GP

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
GP
GP
SUNS
SUNS
Revenue
$7.2M
$5.2M
Net Profit
$-4.7M
$1.6M
Gross Margin
14.6%
Operating Margin
31.2%
Net Margin
-65.6%
31.2%
Revenue YoY
-11.5%
Net Profit YoY
-2.1%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.17
$0.11

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GP
GP
SUNS
SUNS
Q4 25
$5.2M
Q3 25
$6.1M
Q2 25
$5.7M
Q1 25
$4.6M
Q4 24
$7.2M
Q3 24
$5.3M
$3.2M
Q2 24
$3.0M
$2.0M
Q4 23
$8.2M
Net Profit
GP
GP
SUNS
SUNS
Q4 25
$1.6M
Q3 25
$4.1M
Q2 25
$3.4M
Q1 25
$3.1M
Q4 24
$-4.7M
Q3 24
$-4.7M
$1.7M
Q2 24
$-5.4M
$1.5M
Q4 23
$-4.6M
Gross Margin
GP
GP
SUNS
SUNS
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
14.6%
Q3 24
8.6%
Q2 24
7.4%
Q4 23
16.6%
Operating Margin
GP
GP
SUNS
SUNS
Q4 25
31.2%
Q3 25
67.0%
Q2 25
59.2%
Q1 25
67.1%
Q4 24
Q3 24
54.7%
Q2 24
76.5%
Q4 23
Net Margin
GP
GP
SUNS
SUNS
Q4 25
31.2%
Q3 25
67.0%
Q2 25
59.2%
Q1 25
67.1%
Q4 24
-65.6%
Q3 24
-87.9%
54.7%
Q2 24
-179.8%
76.5%
Q4 23
-56.9%
EPS (diluted)
GP
GP
SUNS
SUNS
Q4 25
$0.11
Q3 25
$0.30
Q2 25
$0.25
Q1 25
$0.27
Q4 24
$-0.17
Q3 24
$-0.18
$0.25
Q2 24
$-0.21
$0.22
Q4 23
$-0.19

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GP
GP
SUNS
SUNS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$621.1K
$6.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$2.1M
$182.0M
Total Assets
$37.4M
$310.2M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GP
GP
SUNS
SUNS
Q4 25
$6.4M
Q3 25
$5.5M
Q2 25
$5.6M
Q1 25
$1.6M
Q4 24
$621.1K
Q3 24
$116.9K
$70.2M
Q2 24
$528.3K
$11.3M
Q4 23
$4.0M
Stockholders' Equity
GP
GP
SUNS
SUNS
Q4 25
$182.0M
Q3 25
$184.6M
Q2 25
$184.3M
Q1 25
$184.8M
Q4 24
$2.1M
Q3 24
$4.2M
$112.1M
Q2 24
$8.6M
$48.9M
Q4 23
$18.1M
Total Assets
GP
GP
SUNS
SUNS
Q4 25
$310.2M
Q3 25
$258.8M
Q2 25
$256.5M
Q1 25
$234.4M
Q4 24
$37.4M
Q3 24
$39.4M
$167.8M
Q2 24
$43.5M
$49.5M
Q4 23
$50.2M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GP
GP
SUNS
SUNS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-1.1M
$-3.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-2.11×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GP
GP
SUNS
SUNS
Q4 25
$-3.4M
Q3 25
$-656.3K
Q2 25
$-322.7K
Q1 25
$-914.6K
Q4 24
$-1.1M
Q3 24
$-1.3M
$-513.1K
Q2 24
$-3.2M
Q4 23
$1.4M
Cash Conversion
GP
GP
SUNS
SUNS
Q4 25
-2.11×
Q3 25
-0.16×
Q2 25
-0.10×
Q1 25
-0.30×
Q4 24
Q3 24
-0.30×
Q2 24
Q4 23

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons