vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Genuine Parts Company (GPC) and GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO (GT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Genuine Parts Company is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.3B vs $4.9B, roughly 1.3× GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO). Genuine Parts Company runs the higher net margin — 3.0% vs 2.1%, a 0.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Genuine Parts Company posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.8% vs -0.6%). GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.3B vs $-33.6M). Over the past eight quarters, GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO's revenue compounded faster (4.1% CAGR vs 2.5%).

Genuine Parts Company (GPC) is an American automotive and industrial parts distributor based in Atlanta, Georgia. Established by brothers Carlyle and Malcolm Fraser in 1928, the company has approximately 60,000 employees. In addition to the United States, GPC has operated in Australasia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Mexico, the Netherlands, Poland, and the United Kingdom.

Cooper Tire & Rubber Company is an American company that specializes in the design, manufacture, marketing, and sales of replacement automobile and truck tires, and has subsidiaries that specialize in medium truck, motorcycle, and racing tires. With headquarters in Findlay, Ohio, Cooper Tire has 60 manufacturing, sales, distribution, technical, and design facilities within its worldwide family of subsidiary companies, including the UK-based Avon Tyres brand, which produces tires for motorcycl...

GPC vs GT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
GPC
GPC
1.3× larger
GPC
$6.3B
$4.9B
GT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
GPC
GPC
+7.4% gap
GPC
6.8%
-0.6%
GT
Higher net margin
GPC
GPC
0.9% more per $
GPC
3.0%
2.1%
GT
More free cash flow
GT
GT
$1.4B more FCF
GT
$1.3B
$-33.6M
GPC
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
GT
GT
Annualised
GT
4.1%
2.5%
GPC

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
GPC
GPC
GT
GT
Revenue
$6.3B
$4.9B
Net Profit
$188.5M
$105.0M
Gross Margin
37.3%
20.9%
Operating Margin
67.2%
3.3%
Net Margin
3.0%
2.1%
Revenue YoY
6.8%
-0.6%
Net Profit YoY
-3.0%
43.8%
EPS (diluted)
$1.37
$0.36

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GPC
GPC
GT
GT
Q1 26
$6.3B
Q4 25
$6.0B
$4.9B
Q3 25
$6.3B
$4.6B
Q2 25
$6.2B
$4.5B
Q1 25
$5.9B
$4.3B
Q4 24
$5.8B
$4.9B
Q3 24
$6.0B
$4.8B
Q2 24
$6.0B
$4.6B
Net Profit
GPC
GPC
GT
GT
Q1 26
$188.5M
Q4 25
$-609.5M
$105.0M
Q3 25
$226.2M
$-2.2B
Q2 25
$254.9M
$254.0M
Q1 25
$194.4M
$115.0M
Q4 24
$133.1M
$73.0M
Q3 24
$226.6M
$-37.0M
Q2 24
$295.5M
$79.0M
Gross Margin
GPC
GPC
GT
GT
Q1 26
37.3%
Q4 25
35.0%
20.9%
Q3 25
37.4%
18.2%
Q2 25
37.7%
17.0%
Q1 25
37.1%
17.4%
Q4 24
35.9%
19.9%
Q3 24
36.8%
19.5%
Q2 24
36.6%
20.6%
Operating Margin
GPC
GPC
GT
GT
Q1 26
67.2%
Q4 25
-13.8%
3.3%
Q3 25
4.7%
-15.8%
Q2 25
5.5%
6.8%
Q1 25
4.3%
3.1%
Q4 24
2.9%
1.5%
Q3 24
5.0%
-0.6%
Q2 24
6.5%
2.9%
Net Margin
GPC
GPC
GT
GT
Q1 26
3.0%
Q4 25
-10.1%
2.1%
Q3 25
3.6%
-47.3%
Q2 25
4.1%
5.7%
Q1 25
3.3%
2.7%
Q4 24
2.3%
1.5%
Q3 24
3.8%
-0.8%
Q2 24
5.0%
1.7%
EPS (diluted)
GPC
GPC
GT
GT
Q1 26
$1.37
Q4 25
$-4.38
$0.36
Q3 25
$1.62
$-7.62
Q2 25
$1.83
$0.87
Q1 25
$1.40
$0.40
Q4 24
$0.96
$0.25
Q3 24
$1.62
$-0.13
Q2 24
$2.11
$0.28

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GPC
GPC
GT
GT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$500.0M
$801.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$4.6B
$5.3B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$4.5B
$3.2B
Total Assets
$21.0B
$18.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.03×
1.65×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GPC
GPC
GT
GT
Q1 26
$500.0M
Q4 25
$801.0M
Q3 25
$810.0M
Q2 25
$785.0M
Q1 25
$902.0M
Q4 24
$810.0M
Q3 24
$905.0M
Q2 24
$789.0M
Total Debt
GPC
GPC
GT
GT
Q1 26
$4.6B
Q4 25
$4.8B
$5.3B
Q3 25
$7.3B
Q2 25
$6.6B
Q1 25
$7.3B
Q4 24
$4.3B
$6.4B
Q3 24
$7.4B
Q2 24
$6.8B
Stockholders' Equity
GPC
GPC
GT
GT
Q1 26
$4.5B
Q4 25
$4.4B
$3.2B
Q3 25
$4.8B
$3.0B
Q2 25
$4.7B
$5.1B
Q1 25
$4.4B
$4.9B
Q4 24
$4.3B
$4.7B
Q3 24
$4.7B
$4.7B
Q2 24
$4.5B
$4.7B
Total Assets
GPC
GPC
GT
GT
Q1 26
$21.0B
Q4 25
$20.8B
$18.2B
Q3 25
$20.7B
$20.2B
Q2 25
$20.4B
$22.3B
Q1 25
$19.8B
$21.7B
Q4 24
$19.3B
$20.9B
Q3 24
$20.3B
$22.5B
Q2 24
$18.9B
$22.0B
Debt / Equity
GPC
GPC
GT
GT
Q1 26
1.03×
Q4 25
1.08×
1.65×
Q3 25
2.42×
Q2 25
1.28×
Q1 25
1.48×
Q4 24
0.99×
1.37×
Q3 24
1.57×
Q2 24
1.45×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GPC
GPC
GT
GT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$1.5B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-33.6M
$1.3B
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-0.5%
27.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
3.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
14.40×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$548.0M
$-30.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GPC
GPC
GT
GT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$380.1M
$1.5B
Q3 25
$341.6M
$2.0M
Q2 25
$209.9M
$-180.0M
Q1 25
$-40.8M
$-538.0M
Q4 24
$155.0M
$1.3B
Q3 24
$484.3M
$-73.0M
Q2 24
$293.6M
$-67.0M
Free Cash Flow
GPC
GPC
GT
GT
Q1 26
$-33.6M
Q4 25
$260.7M
$1.3B
Q3 25
$240.0M
$-181.0M
Q2 25
$81.0M
$-387.0M
Q1 25
$-160.7M
$-797.0M
Q4 24
$-26.7M
$1.0B
Q3 24
$358.0M
$-351.0M
Q2 24
$150.1M
$-383.0M
FCF Margin
GPC
GPC
GT
GT
Q1 26
-0.5%
Q4 25
4.3%
27.2%
Q3 25
3.8%
-3.9%
Q2 25
1.3%
-8.7%
Q1 25
-2.7%
-18.7%
Q4 24
-0.5%
20.5%
Q3 24
6.0%
-7.3%
Q2 24
2.5%
-8.4%
Capex Intensity
GPC
GPC
GT
GT
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.0%
3.6%
Q3 25
1.6%
3.9%
Q2 25
2.1%
4.6%
Q1 25
2.0%
6.1%
Q4 24
3.1%
5.6%
Q3 24
2.1%
5.8%
Q2 24
2.4%
6.9%
Cash Conversion
GPC
GPC
GT
GT
Q1 26
Q4 25
14.40×
Q3 25
1.51×
Q2 25
0.82×
-0.71×
Q1 25
-0.21×
-4.68×
Q4 24
1.17×
17.66×
Q3 24
2.14×
Q2 24
0.99×
-0.85×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

GPC
GPC

Segment breakdown not available.

GT
GT

Tire Unit Sales$2.4B50%
Other$2.3B46%
Other Tireand Related Sales$192.0M4%

Related Comparisons