vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of GULFPORT ENERGY CORP (GPOR) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $398.2M, roughly 1.4× GULFPORT ENERGY CORP). GULFPORT ENERGY CORP runs the higher net margin — 33.3% vs 29.8%, a 3.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GULFPORT ENERGY CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (66.0% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, GULFPORT ENERGY CORP's revenue compounded faster (18.6% CAGR vs 5.6%).

Gulfport Energy Corp is a U.S.-headquartered independent oil and natural gas exploration and production company. It primarily operates in onshore resource basins including Ohio's Utica Shale and Oklahoma's SCOOP play, producing natural gas, crude oil, and natural gas liquids to supply North American industrial, utility, and commercial end markets.

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

GPOR vs KIM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.4× larger
KIM
$558.0M
$398.2M
GPOR
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
GPOR
GPOR
+62.0% gap
GPOR
66.0%
4.0%
KIM
Higher net margin
GPOR
GPOR
3.4% more per $
GPOR
33.3%
29.8%
KIM
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
GPOR
GPOR
Annualised
GPOR
18.6%
5.6%
KIM

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
GPOR
GPOR
KIM
KIM
Revenue
$398.2M
$558.0M
Net Profit
$132.4M
$166.3M
Gross Margin
76.6%
Operating Margin
44.9%
37.2%
Net Margin
33.3%
29.8%
Revenue YoY
66.0%
4.0%
Net Profit YoY
148.5%
23.7%
EPS (diluted)
$7.98
$0.46

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GPOR
GPOR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$558.0M
Q4 25
$398.2M
$542.5M
Q3 25
$379.7M
$535.9M
Q2 25
$447.6M
$525.2M
Q1 25
$197.0M
$536.6M
Q4 24
$239.9M
$525.4M
Q3 24
$253.9M
$507.6M
Q2 24
$181.1M
$500.2M
Net Profit
GPOR
GPOR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$132.4M
$151.2M
Q3 25
$111.4M
$137.8M
Q2 25
$184.5M
$163.0M
Q1 25
$-464.0K
$132.8M
Q4 24
$-273.2M
$166.0M
Q3 24
$-14.0M
$136.0M
Q2 24
$-26.2M
$119.7M
Gross Margin
GPOR
GPOR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
76.6%
Q3 25
74.6%
Q2 25
80.7%
Q1 25
57.9%
Q4 24
63.2%
Q3 24
64.6%
Q2 24
52.2%
Operating Margin
GPOR
GPOR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
44.9%
36.4%
Q3 25
41.9%
34.9%
Q2 25
56.0%
39.2%
Q1 25
6.1%
33.6%
Q4 24
-131.3%
31.7%
Q3 24
5.7%
33.7%
Q2 24
-10.0%
32.1%
Net Margin
GPOR
GPOR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
33.3%
27.9%
Q3 25
29.3%
25.7%
Q2 25
41.2%
31.0%
Q1 25
-0.2%
24.8%
Q4 24
-113.9%
31.6%
Q3 24
-5.5%
26.8%
Q2 24
-14.5%
23.9%
EPS (diluted)
GPOR
GPOR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
$7.98
Q3 25
$4.45
Q2 25
$9.12
Q1 25
$-0.07
Q4 24
$-14.72
Q3 24
$-0.83
Q2 24
$-1.51

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GPOR
GPOR
KIM
KIM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$788.2M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.8B
$10.4B
Total Assets
$3.0B
$19.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.43×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GPOR
GPOR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.8M
$211.6M
Q3 25
$3.4M
$159.3M
Q2 25
$3.8M
$226.6M
Q1 25
$5.3M
$131.3M
Q4 24
$1.5M
$688.6M
Q3 24
$3.2M
$789.0M
Q2 24
$1.2M
$126.4M
Total Debt
GPOR
GPOR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$788.2M
$7.7B
Q3 25
$691.7M
Q2 25
$695.2M
Q1 25
$700.4M
Q4 24
$702.9M
$8.0B
Q3 24
$694.4M
Q2 24
$679.5M
Stockholders' Equity
GPOR
GPOR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$1.8B
$10.4B
Q3 25
$1.8B
$10.5B
Q2 25
$1.8B
$10.5B
Q1 25
$1.7B
$10.6B
Q4 24
$1.7B
$10.7B
Q3 24
$2.1B
$10.5B
Q2 24
$2.1B
$10.6B
Total Assets
GPOR
GPOR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$3.0B
$19.7B
Q3 25
$2.9B
$19.9B
Q2 25
$3.0B
$19.8B
Q1 25
$2.9B
$19.7B
Q4 24
$2.9B
$20.3B
Q3 24
$3.2B
$20.1B
Q2 24
$3.2B
$19.5B
Debt / Equity
GPOR
GPOR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.43×
0.74×
Q3 25
0.38×
Q2 25
0.39×
Q1 25
0.42×
Q4 24
0.41×
0.75×
Q3 24
0.34×
Q2 24
0.32×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GPOR
GPOR
KIM
KIM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$185.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.40×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GPOR
GPOR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$185.4M
$258.4M
Q3 25
$209.1M
$332.4M
Q2 25
$231.4M
$305.4M
Q1 25
$177.3M
$223.8M
Q4 24
$148.8M
$239.5M
Q3 24
$189.7M
$295.9M
Q2 24
$123.5M
$294.1M
Free Cash Flow
GPOR
GPOR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
$205.4M
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
FCF Margin
GPOR
GPOR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
38.3%
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Capex Intensity
GPOR
GPOR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
Q3 25
0.0%
Q2 25
0.0%
Q1 25
3.4%
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Cash Conversion
GPOR
GPOR
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.40×
1.71×
Q3 25
1.88×
2.41×
Q2 25
1.25×
1.87×
Q1 25
1.69×
Q4 24
1.44×
Q3 24
2.18×
Q2 24
2.46×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

GPOR
GPOR

Natural Gas Production$296.9M75%
Other$42.7M11%
Naturalgasliquidsales$35.2M9%
Oil And Condensate$23.4M6%

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

Related Comparisons