vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS) and John Marshall Bancorp, Inc. (JMSB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hyperscale Data, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.9M vs $16.8M, roughly 1.6× John Marshall Bancorp, Inc.). John Marshall Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 36.3% vs -112.0%, a 148.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, John Marshall Bancorp, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (15.3% CAGR vs -16.3%).
Hyperscale Data, Inc. provides GPU-accelerated computing infrastructure and cloud solutions tailored for AI development, big data processing, and high-performance computing workloads. It primarily serves AI startups, large technology firms, and cloud service providers across North America and the Asia-Pacific region, delivering scalable, high-efficiency computing resources to support complex data processing needs.
John Marshall Bancorp, Inc. is a U.S.-based bank holding company that operates through its wholly owned subsidiary John Marshall Bank. It provides a full suite of commercial and consumer banking products including deposit accounts, commercial loans, residential mortgages, and personal financial services, primarily serving retail customers and small-to-mid-sized businesses across the U.S. Mid-Atlantic region.
GPUS vs JMSB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.9M | $16.8M |
| Net Profit | $-30.1M | $6.1M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -117.8% | — |
| Net Margin | -112.0% | 36.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 38.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -6670.3% | 26.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.43 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $16.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $26.9M | $16.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.3M | $16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.9M | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.0M | $14.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.4M | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.1M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.8M | $12.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-30.1M | $5.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.0M | $5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.1M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.2M | $4.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-445.0K | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.5M | $4.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-33.9M | $3.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -117.8% | 47.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -57.8% | 42.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -39.2% | 42.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -25.5% | 42.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -46.8% | 42.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -79.2% | 38.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -151.4% | 39.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 36.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | -112.0% | 36.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -53.5% | 33.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.7% | 33.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.8% | 32.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -82.3% | 30.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -190.7% | 30.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.43 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.39 | $0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.66 | $0.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.34 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.78 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-24.82 | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.81 | $0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.1M | $150.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $83.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.8M | $268.1M |
| Total Assets | $313.7M | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.69× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $150.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.1M | $130.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.8M | $163.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9M | $116.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | $169.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | $122.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $177.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6M | $182.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $83.1M | $80.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.0M | $80.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.5M | $80.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $92.8M | $80.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.7M | $80.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.8M | $80.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.8M | $24.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $268.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $119.8M | $265.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.9M | $259.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5M | $253.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $253.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.6M | $246.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | $243.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.7M | $235.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $313.7M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $242.4M | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $213.5M | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $218.5M | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $220.8M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.5M | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $270.8M | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.69× | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | 0.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.06× | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.71× | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.19× | 0.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.41× | 0.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.00× | 0.11× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-37.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-56.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -208.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 68.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-87.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-37.7M | $22.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-17.8M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.1M | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.0M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.2M | $17.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.7M | $10.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-56.2M | $22.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.6M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.5M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.8M | $6.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.3M | $16.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.9M | $10.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -208.7% | 134.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -84.5% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.5% | 47.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -27.3% | 45.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -47.6% | 116.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.4% | 80.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 68.6% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | 0.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.82× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GPUS
| Transferred Over Time | $10.4M | 39% |
| Revenue From Mined Crypto Assets At Sentinum Owned And Operated Facilities | $5.8M | 21% |
| Hotel And Real Estate Operations | $4.8M | 18% |
| Other | $4.0M | 15% |
| Turn On Green | $2.0M | 7% |
JMSB
| Net Interest Income | $16.5M | 98% |
| Noninterest Income | $284.0K | 2% |
