vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS) and Pulmonx Corp (LUNG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hyperscale Data, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.9M vs $20.6M, roughly 1.3× Pulmonx Corp). Pulmonx Corp runs the higher net margin — -66.3% vs -112.0%, a 45.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hyperscale Data, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (38.4% vs -8.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Pulmonx Corp's revenue compounded faster (-0.5% CAGR vs -16.3%).
Hyperscale Data, Inc. provides GPU-accelerated computing infrastructure and cloud solutions tailored for AI development, big data processing, and high-performance computing workloads. It primarily serves AI startups, large technology firms, and cloud service providers across North America and the Asia-Pacific region, delivering scalable, high-efficiency computing resources to support complex data processing needs.
Pulmonx Corp is a global medical tech firm focused on interventional pulmonology solutions. It develops minimally invasive endobronchial valves to treat severe COPD and emphysema, with products sold across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific for patients with advanced lung conditions.
GPUS vs LUNG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.9M | $20.6M |
| Net Profit | $-30.1M | $-13.7M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | 77.9% |
| Operating Margin | -117.8% | -40.9% |
| Net Margin | -112.0% | -66.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 38.4% | -8.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6670.3% | 5.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $20.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $26.9M | $22.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.3M | $21.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.9M | $23.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.0M | $22.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.4M | $23.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.1M | $20.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.8M | $20.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-13.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-30.1M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.0M | $-14.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.1M | $-15.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.2M | $-14.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-445.0K | $-13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.5M | $-14.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-33.9M | $-15.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 77.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | 77.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | 74.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.7% | 72.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.1% | 72.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.5% | 74.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.5% | 73.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.3% | 73.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | -40.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -117.8% | -43.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -57.8% | -66.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -39.2% | -62.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -25.5% | -64.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -46.8% | -56.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -79.2% | -69.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -151.4% | -75.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | -66.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | -112.0% | -46.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -53.5% | -64.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.7% | -63.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.8% | -64.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | -55.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -82.3% | -69.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -190.7% | -73.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.33 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.39 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.66 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.36 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.78 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-24.82 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.81 | $-0.39 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.1M | $61.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $83.1M | $37.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.8M | $45.8M |
| Total Assets | $313.7M | $120.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.69× | 0.82× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $61.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.1M | $69.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.8M | $76.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9M | $75.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | $74.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | $70.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $63.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6M | $63.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $37.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $83.1M | $37.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.0M | $37.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.5M | $37.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $92.8M | $37.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.7M | $37.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.8M | $37.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.8M | $37.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $45.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $119.8M | $54.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.9M | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5M | $69.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $77.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.6M | $85.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.7M | $101.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $120.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $313.7M | $129.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $242.4M | $138.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $213.5M | $147.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $218.5M | $150.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $220.8M | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.5M | $167.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $270.8M | $172.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.82× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.69× | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | 0.62× | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.06× | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.71× | 0.48× | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.19× | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.41× | 0.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.00× | 0.37× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-37.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-56.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -208.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 68.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-87.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-37.7M | $-7.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-17.8M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.1M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.0M | $-13.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.2M | $-6.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.7M | $-5.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-56.2M | $-7.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.6M | $-8.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.5M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.8M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.3M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.9M | $-6.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -208.7% | -31.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -84.5% | -38.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.5% | -16.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -27.3% | -60.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -47.6% | -28.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | -37.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.4% | -30.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 68.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.5% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | 2.3% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GPUS
| Transferred Over Time | $10.4M | 39% |
| Revenue From Mined Crypto Assets At Sentinum Owned And Operated Facilities | $5.8M | 21% |
| Hotel And Real Estate Operations | $4.8M | 18% |
| Other | $4.0M | 15% |
| Turn On Green | $2.0M | 7% |
LUNG
Segment breakdown not available.
