vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS) and MetroCity Bankshares, Inc. (MCBS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MetroCity Bankshares, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($43.7M vs $26.9M, roughly 1.6× Hyperscale Data, Inc.). MetroCity Bankshares, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 50.5% vs -112.0%, a 162.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hyperscale Data, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (38.4% vs 23.6%). MetroCity Bankshares, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($37.0M vs $-56.2M). Over the past eight quarters, MetroCity Bankshares, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (15.7% CAGR vs -16.3%).
Hyperscale Data, Inc. provides GPU-accelerated computing infrastructure and cloud solutions tailored for AI development, big data processing, and high-performance computing workloads. It primarily serves AI startups, large technology firms, and cloud service providers across North America and the Asia-Pacific region, delivering scalable, high-efficiency computing resources to support complex data processing needs.
Metro City Bank is a Korean-American bank based in Doraville, Georgia and offers personal and commercial banking services. It is the largest Korean-American bank to not be based out of Los Angeles, California. It currently operates a total of 19 branches in Texas, New York, New Jersey, Virginia, Georgia, Alabama, and Florida.
GPUS vs MCBS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.9M | $43.7M |
| Net Profit | $-30.1M | $18.1M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -117.8% | 52.8% |
| Net Margin | -112.0% | 50.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 38.4% | 23.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6670.3% | 11.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.9M | $43.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.3M | $38.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.9M | $37.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.0M | $36.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.4M | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.1M | $36.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.8M | $36.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.4M | $32.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-30.1M | $18.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.0M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.1M | $16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.2M | $16.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-445.0K | $16.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.5M | $16.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-33.9M | $16.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7M | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -117.8% | 52.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -57.8% | 62.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -39.2% | 62.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -25.5% | 61.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -46.8% | 58.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -79.2% | 61.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -151.4% | 64.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | 62.6% |
| Q4 25 | -112.0% | 50.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -53.5% | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.7% | 44.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.8% | 45.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | 54.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -82.3% | 45.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -190.7% | 46.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.7% | 44.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.39 | $0.67 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.66 | $0.65 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.63 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.78 | $0.64 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-24.82 | $0.65 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.81 | $0.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.32 | $0.57 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.1M | $383.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $83.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.8M | $544.2M |
| Total Assets | $313.7M | $4.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.69× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.1M | $383.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.8M | $227.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9M | $286.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | $285.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | $249.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $291.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6M | $327.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.9M | $258.8M |
| Q4 25 | $83.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $92.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $119.8M | $544.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.9M | $445.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5M | $436.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $428.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.6M | $421.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | $407.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.7M | $407.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.0M | $396.6M |
| Q4 25 | $313.7M | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $242.4M | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $213.5M | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $218.5M | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $220.8M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.5M | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $270.8M | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $299.8M | $3.6B |
| Q4 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.71× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.19× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.41× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.00× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.51× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-37.7M | $37.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-56.2M | $37.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -208.7% | 84.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 68.6% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.08× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-87.1M | $79.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-37.7M | $37.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-17.8M | $16.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.1M | $14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.0M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.2M | $63.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.7M | $19.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-10.2M | $36.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-56.2M | $37.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.6M | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.5M | $14.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.8M | $11.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.3M | $62.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $-11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.9M | $19.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.6M | $36.1M |
| Q4 25 | -208.7% | 84.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -84.5% | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.5% | 37.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -27.3% | 32.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -47.6% | 175.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | -31.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.4% | 52.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -30.3% | 110.6% |
| Q4 25 | 68.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.91× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.75× | 2.49× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GPUS
| Transferred Over Time | $10.4M | 39% |
| Revenue From Mined Crypto Assets At Sentinum Owned And Operated Facilities | $5.8M | 21% |
| Hotel And Real Estate Operations | $4.8M | 18% |
| Other | $4.0M | 15% |
| Turn On Green | $2.0M | 7% |
MCBS
Segment breakdown not available.
