vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS) and OP Bancorp (OPBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hyperscale Data, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.9M vs $24.3M, roughly 1.1× OP Bancorp). On growth, Hyperscale Data, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (38.4% vs 13.7%). OP Bancorp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($23.4M vs $-56.2M). Over the past eight quarters, OP Bancorp's revenue compounded faster (11.4% CAGR vs -16.3%).
Hyperscale Data, Inc. provides GPU-accelerated computing infrastructure and cloud solutions tailored for AI development, big data processing, and high-performance computing workloads. It primarily serves AI startups, large technology firms, and cloud service providers across North America and the Asia-Pacific region, delivering scalable, high-efficiency computing resources to support complex data processing needs.
OP Bancorp is the bank holding company for Open Bank, a community-oriented commercial bank headquartered in California, United States. It provides a full range of banking solutions including deposit accounts, commercial real estate loans, small business financing, and consumer lending products, primarily catering to small and medium-sized enterprises, local immigrant communities, and retail clients across Southern California.
GPUS vs OPBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.9M | $24.3M |
| Net Profit | $-30.1M | — |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -117.8% | 39.2% |
| Net Margin | -112.0% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 38.4% | 13.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6670.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.48 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.9M | $24.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.3M | $24.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.9M | $23.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.0M | $22.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.4M | $21.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.1M | $20.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.8M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.4M | $19.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-30.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.0M | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.1M | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.2M | $5.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-445.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.5M | $5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-33.9M | $5.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -117.8% | 39.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -57.8% | 39.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -39.2% | 35.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -25.5% | 34.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -46.8% | 31.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -79.2% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -151.4% | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | 37.1% |
| Q4 25 | -112.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -53.5% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.7% | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.8% | 25.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -82.3% | 26.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -190.7% | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.7% | 26.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.39 | $0.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.66 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.78 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-24.82 | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.81 | $0.36 | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.32 | $0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.1M | $167.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $83.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.8M | $227.9M |
| Total Assets | $313.7M | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.69× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.1M | $167.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.8M | $166.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9M | $205.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | $198.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | $134.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $166.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6M | $127.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.9M | $139.2M |
| Q4 25 | $83.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $92.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $119.8M | $227.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.9M | $221.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5M | $213.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $210.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.6M | $205.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | $203.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.7M | $195.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.0M | $194.7M |
| Q4 25 | $313.7M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $242.4M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $213.5M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $218.5M | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $220.8M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.5M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $270.8M | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $299.8M | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.71× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.19× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.41× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.00× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.51× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-37.7M | $26.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-56.2M | $23.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -208.7% | 96.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 68.6% | 11.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-87.1M | $43.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-37.7M | $26.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-17.8M | $23.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.1M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.0M | $5.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.2M | $31.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7M | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.7M | $15.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-10.2M | $-3.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-56.2M | $23.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.6M | $23.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.5M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.8M | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.3M | $29.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.9M | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.6M | $-3.2M |
| Q4 25 | -208.7% | 96.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -84.5% | 95.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.5% | -32.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -27.3% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -47.6% | 139.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 61.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.4% | 77.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -30.3% | -16.6% |
| Q4 25 | 68.6% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.5% | 6.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.45× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.90× | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.75× | -0.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GPUS
| Transferred Over Time | $10.4M | 39% |
| Revenue From Mined Crypto Assets At Sentinum Owned And Operated Facilities | $5.8M | 21% |
| Hotel And Real Estate Operations | $4.8M | 18% |
| Other | $4.0M | 15% |
| Turn On Green | $2.0M | 7% |
OPBK
Segment breakdown not available.
