vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS) and SBC Medical Group Holdings Inc (SBC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SBC Medical Group Holdings Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($39.6M vs $26.9M, roughly 1.5× Hyperscale Data, Inc.). SBC Medical Group Holdings Inc runs the higher net margin — 35.9% vs -112.0%, a 147.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hyperscale Data, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (38.4% vs -10.9%). SBC Medical Group Holdings Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($51.2M vs $-56.2M). Over the past eight quarters, SBC Medical Group Holdings Inc's revenue compounded faster (-15.0% CAGR vs -16.3%).
Hyperscale Data, Inc. provides GPU-accelerated computing infrastructure and cloud solutions tailored for AI development, big data processing, and high-performance computing workloads. It primarily serves AI startups, large technology firms, and cloud service providers across North America and the Asia-Pacific region, delivering scalable, high-efficiency computing resources to support complex data processing needs.
SBC Medical Group Holdings Inc. is a leading Japan-headquartered healthcare provider primarily focused on aesthetic medicine, dermatology, and anti-aging wellness services. It operates an extensive network of clinics across Japan, catering to both domestic patients and international medical tourists, with core offerings including cosmetic surgery and non-invasive skincare treatments.
GPUS vs SBC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.9M | $39.6M |
| Net Profit | $-30.1M | $14.2M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | 73.1% |
| Operating Margin | -117.8% | 32.5% |
| Net Margin | -112.0% | 35.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 38.4% | -10.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6670.3% | 117.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.9M | $39.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.3M | $43.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.9M | $43.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.0M | $47.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.4M | $44.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.1M | $53.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.8M | $53.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.4M | $54.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-30.1M | $14.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.0M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.1M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.2M | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-445.0K | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.5M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-33.9M | $18.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7M | $18.8M |
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | 73.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | 70.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.7% | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.1% | 79.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.5% | 76.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.5% | 81.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.3% | 74.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.4% | 72.1% |
| Q4 25 | -117.8% | 32.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -57.8% | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -39.2% | 33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -25.5% | 51.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -46.8% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -79.2% | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -151.4% | 51.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | 44.6% |
| Q4 25 | -112.0% | 35.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -53.5% | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.7% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.8% | 45.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -82.3% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -190.7% | 34.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.7% | 34.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.39 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.66 | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.78 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-24.82 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.81 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.32 | $0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.1M | $164.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $83.1M | $42.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.8M | $248.3M |
| Total Assets | $313.7M | $380.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.69× | 0.17× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.1M | $164.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.8M | $127.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9M | $152.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | $132.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | $125.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $137.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $83.1M | $42.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.0M | $21.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.5M | $7.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $92.8M | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.7M | $6.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.8M | $823.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $119.8M | $248.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.9M | $248.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5M | $244.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $226.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.6M | $195.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | $205.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.7M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.0M | $9.0M |
| Q4 25 | $313.7M | $380.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $242.4M | $321.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $213.5M | $315.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $218.5M | $284.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $220.8M | $266.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.5M | $296.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $270.8M | $19.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $299.8M | $19.8M |
| Q4 25 | 0.69× | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | 0.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.06× | 0.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.71× | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.19× | 0.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.41× | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.00× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.51× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-37.7M | $52.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-56.2M | $51.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -208.7% | 129.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 68.6% | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-87.1M | $23.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-37.7M | $52.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-17.8M | $-20.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.1M | $-8.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.0M | $1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.2M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7M | $5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.7M | $19.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-10.2M | $3.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-56.2M | $51.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.6M | $-20.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.5M | $-8.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.8M | $1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.3M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $4.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.9M | $18.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.6M | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | -208.7% | 129.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -84.5% | -48.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.5% | -19.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -27.3% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -47.6% | -17.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.4% | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -30.3% | 5.4% |
| Q4 25 | 68.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.77× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.75× | 0.20× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GPUS
| Transferred Over Time | $10.4M | 39% |
| Revenue From Mined Crypto Assets At Sentinum Owned And Operated Facilities | $5.8M | 21% |
| Hotel And Real Estate Operations | $4.8M | 18% |
| Other | $4.0M | 15% |
| Turn On Green | $2.0M | 7% |
SBC
| Franchising | $10.3M | 26% |
| Medical Corporation Shobikai | $8.1M | 21% |
| Medical Corporation Nasukai | $7.2M | 18% |
| Management Services | $6.3M | 16% |
| Rental Services | $4.3M | 11% |
| Medical Corporation Association Furinkai | $3.0M | 8% |
| Japan Medical And Beauty Inc | $656.5K | 2% |
