vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of GORMAN RUPP CO (GRC) and LANDS' END, INC. (LE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

LANDS' END, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($317.5M vs $166.6M, roughly 1.9× GORMAN RUPP CO). GORMAN RUPP CO runs the higher net margin — 8.3% vs 1.6%, a 6.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GORMAN RUPP CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.4% vs 0.1%). GORMAN RUPP CO produced more free cash flow last quarter ($10.2M vs $-22.4M). Over the past eight quarters, GORMAN RUPP CO's revenue compounded faster (2.3% CAGR vs -0.9%).

Gorman-Rupp is a pump manufacturer in Mansfield, Ohio. It manufactures pumps for municipal, water, wastewater, sewage, industrial, construction, petroleum, fire, and OEM markets. The company is traded on the New York Stock Exchange. Its current CEO is Scott King.

Lands' End, Inc. is an American retailer of clothing, baggage, and furniture which began as a mail-order yachting supply company in 1963 in Chicago. The company is named after Land's End; after promotional materials were printed, the founder noticed the typographical error in the location of the apostrophe, but could not afford to reprint the material. The company operates 26 domestic stores as of February 2024. Lands' End is headquartered in Dodgeville, Wisconsin.

GRC vs LE — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
LE
LE
1.9× larger
LE
$317.5M
$166.6M
GRC
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
GRC
GRC
+2.3% gap
GRC
2.4%
0.1%
LE
Higher net margin
GRC
GRC
6.6% more per $
GRC
8.3%
1.6%
LE
More free cash flow
GRC
GRC
$32.6M more FCF
GRC
$10.2M
$-22.4M
LE
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
GRC
GRC
Annualised
GRC
2.3%
-0.9%
LE

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
GRC
GRC
LE
LE
Revenue
$166.6M
$317.5M
Net Profit
$13.7M
$5.2M
Gross Margin
31.4%
51.8%
Operating Margin
14.9%
5.3%
Net Margin
8.3%
1.6%
Revenue YoY
2.4%
0.1%
Net Profit YoY
25.2%
198.3%
EPS (diluted)
$0.53
$0.17

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GRC
GRC
LE
LE
Q4 25
$166.6M
$317.5M
Q3 25
$172.8M
Q2 25
$179.0M
$261.2M
Q1 25
$163.9M
Q4 24
$162.7M
$318.6M
Q3 24
$168.2M
$317.2M
Q2 24
$169.5M
$285.5M
Q1 24
$159.3M
$514.9M
Net Profit
GRC
GRC
LE
LE
Q4 25
$13.7M
$5.2M
Q3 25
$11.3M
Q2 25
$15.8M
$-8.3M
Q1 25
$12.1M
Q4 24
$11.0M
$-593.0K
Q3 24
$12.9M
$-5.3M
Q2 24
$8.3M
$-6.4M
Q1 24
$7.9M
$-8.6M
Gross Margin
GRC
GRC
LE
LE
Q4 25
31.4%
51.8%
Q3 25
29.2%
Q2 25
31.3%
50.8%
Q1 25
30.7%
Q4 24
30.2%
50.6%
Q3 24
31.3%
47.9%
Q2 24
31.9%
48.7%
Q1 24
30.4%
38.0%
Operating Margin
GRC
GRC
LE
LE
Q4 25
14.9%
5.3%
Q3 25
12.4%
Q2 25
15.0%
-0.9%
Q1 25
13.5%
Q4 24
13.0%
2.9%
Q3 24
14.2%
0.8%
Q2 24
15.4%
0.8%
Q1 24
12.8%
1.6%
Net Margin
GRC
GRC
LE
LE
Q4 25
8.3%
1.6%
Q3 25
6.6%
Q2 25
8.8%
-3.2%
Q1 25
7.4%
Q4 24
6.7%
-0.2%
Q3 24
7.7%
-1.7%
Q2 24
4.9%
-2.3%
Q1 24
5.0%
-1.7%
EPS (diluted)
GRC
GRC
LE
LE
Q4 25
$0.53
$0.17
Q3 25
$0.43
Q2 25
$0.60
$-0.27
Q1 25
$0.46
Q4 24
$0.42
$-0.02
Q3 24
$0.49
$-0.17
Q2 24
$0.32
$-0.20
Q1 24
$0.30
$-0.27

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GRC
GRC
LE
LE
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$35.1M
$36.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$307.5M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$414.7M
$231.0M
Total Assets
$860.1M
$852.7M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.74×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GRC
GRC
LE
LE
Q4 25
$35.1M
$36.3M
Q3 25
$42.9M
Q2 25
$27.0M
$18.1M
Q1 25
$21.8M
Q4 24
$24.2M
$30.4M
Q3 24
$39.7M
$25.6M
Q2 24
$34.2M
$27.4M
Q1 24
$27.8M
$25.3M
Total Debt
GRC
GRC
LE
LE
Q4 25
$307.5M
Q3 25
$322.3M
Q2 25
$337.1M
Q1 25
$352.2M
Q4 24
$366.6M
Q3 24
$381.0M
Q2 24
$395.4M
Q1 24
$400.7M
Stockholders' Equity
GRC
GRC
LE
LE
Q4 25
$414.7M
$231.0M
Q3 25
$405.2M
Q2 25
$397.8M
$230.1M
Q1 25
$382.1M
Q4 24
$373.8M
$223.6M
Q3 24
$367.3M
$226.5M
Q2 24
$358.6M
$234.6M
Q1 24
$353.7M
$241.6M
Total Assets
GRC
GRC
LE
LE
Q4 25
$860.1M
$852.7M
Q3 25
$869.9M
Q2 25
$861.8M
$760.5M
Q1 25
$857.8M
Q4 24
$858.5M
$843.6M
Q3 24
$883.5M
$802.5M
Q2 24
$891.1M
$800.1M
Q1 24
$887.4M
$811.5M
Debt / Equity
GRC
GRC
LE
LE
Q4 25
0.74×
Q3 25
0.80×
Q2 25
0.85×
Q1 25
0.92×
Q4 24
0.98×
Q3 24
1.04×
Q2 24
1.10×
Q1 24
1.13×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GRC
GRC
LE
LE
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$15.0M
$-15.7M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$10.2M
$-22.4M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
6.1%
-7.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.9%
2.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.09×
-3.03×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$88.9M
$-55.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GRC
GRC
LE
LE
Q4 25
$15.0M
$-15.7M
Q3 25
$42.3M
Q2 25
$27.8M
$-22.5M
Q1 25
$21.1M
Q4 24
$9.3M
$-17.1M
Q3 24
$27.2M
$30.7M
Q2 24
$22.7M
$-25.8M
Q1 24
$10.7M
$93.9M
Free Cash Flow
GRC
GRC
LE
LE
Q4 25
$10.2M
$-22.4M
Q3 25
$35.8M
Q2 25
$24.8M
$-30.7M
Q1 25
$18.1M
Q4 24
$5.2M
$-27.8M
Q3 24
$24.0M
$26.0M
Q2 24
$19.4M
$-32.6M
Q1 24
$6.8M
$87.5M
FCF Margin
GRC
GRC
LE
LE
Q4 25
6.1%
-7.1%
Q3 25
20.7%
Q2 25
13.9%
-11.8%
Q1 25
11.0%
Q4 24
3.2%
-8.7%
Q3 24
14.3%
8.2%
Q2 24
11.5%
-11.4%
Q1 24
4.3%
17.0%
Capex Intensity
GRC
GRC
LE
LE
Q4 25
2.9%
2.1%
Q3 25
3.8%
Q2 25
1.7%
3.2%
Q1 25
1.8%
Q4 24
2.5%
3.3%
Q3 24
1.9%
1.5%
Q2 24
1.9%
2.4%
Q1 24
2.5%
1.2%
Cash Conversion
GRC
GRC
LE
LE
Q4 25
1.09×
-3.03×
Q3 25
3.73×
Q2 25
1.76×
Q1 25
1.74×
Q4 24
0.84×
Q3 24
2.10×
Q2 24
2.72×
Q1 24
1.36×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

GRC
GRC

Industrial$34.7M21%
Fire Market$31.4M19%
Municipal$25.3M15%
Agriculture$22.5M14%
Repair Parts$18.9M11%
Construction$17.3M10%
Original Equipment Manufacturer$10.8M7%
Petroleum$5.6M3%

LE
LE

U Se Commerce$179.8M57%
Business Outfitters Revenue$78.8M25%
Licensing And Retail$20.2M6%
Other$19.8M6%
Third Party$18.9M6%

Related Comparisons