vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE) and Outdoor Holding Co (POWW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Outdoor Holding Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.4M vs $11.5M, roughly 1.2× Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc.). Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 26.3% vs 16.7%, a 9.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-22.6% vs -54.1%).

Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. is a U.S.-based firm operating integrated cryptocurrency mining facilities and low-carbon power generation assets, including natural gas and renewable energy projects. It aligns digital asset mining with efficient energy use, primarily serving North American digital asset and energy market segments.

Vista Outdoor Inc. was an American designer, manufacturer, and marketer that operated in two segments: shooting sports and outdoor products. It was a "house of brands" with more than 40 labels and subsidiaries.

GREE vs POWW — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
POWW
POWW
1.2× larger
POWW
$13.4M
$11.5M
GREE
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
GREE
GREE
+31.5% gap
GREE
-22.6%
-54.1%
POWW
Higher net margin
GREE
GREE
9.6% more per $
GREE
26.3%
16.7%
POWW

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
GREE
GREE
POWW
POWW
Revenue
$11.5M
$13.4M
Net Profit
$3.0M
$2.2M
Gross Margin
87.1%
Operating Margin
14.7%
14.7%
Net Margin
26.3%
16.7%
Revenue YoY
-22.6%
-54.1%
Net Profit YoY
177.1%
108.5%
EPS (diluted)
$0.26
$0.01

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GREE
GREE
POWW
POWW
Q4 25
$11.5M
$13.4M
Q3 25
$15.2M
$12.0M
Q2 25
$12.9M
$11.9M
Q1 25
$19.2M
$12.6M
Q4 24
$14.8M
$12.5M
Q3 24
$12.4M
$12.0M
Q2 24
$13.1M
$12.3M
Q1 24
$19.3M
$-50.7M
Net Profit
GREE
GREE
POWW
POWW
Q4 25
$3.0M
$2.2M
Q3 25
$12.0M
$1.4M
Q2 25
$-4.1M
$-6.5M
Q1 25
$-5.6M
$-77.5M
Q4 24
$-3.9M
$-26.1M
Q3 24
$-6.4M
$-12.4M
Q2 24
$-5.6M
$-14.8M
Q1 24
$-3.9M
$-5.2M
Gross Margin
GREE
GREE
POWW
POWW
Q4 25
87.1%
Q3 25
87.1%
Q2 25
87.2%
Q1 25
87.5%
Q4 24
87.4%
Q3 24
86.9%
Q2 24
85.8%
Q1 24
Operating Margin
GREE
GREE
POWW
POWW
Q4 25
14.7%
14.7%
Q3 25
2.0%
5.9%
Q2 25
-26.4%
-50.7%
Q1 25
-12.4%
-213.6%
Q4 24
-8.9%
-163.8%
Q3 24
-37.7%
-50.3%
Q2 24
-28.8%
-50.8%
Q1 24
-8.9%
Net Margin
GREE
GREE
POWW
POWW
Q4 25
26.3%
16.7%
Q3 25
78.6%
11.7%
Q2 25
-32.0%
-54.5%
Q1 25
-28.9%
-614.5%
Q4 24
-26.4%
-208.7%
Q3 24
-51.6%
-103.7%
Q2 24
-42.6%
-120.2%
Q1 24
-20.4%
10.3%
EPS (diluted)
GREE
GREE
POWW
POWW
Q4 25
$0.26
$0.01
Q3 25
$0.75
$0.01
Q2 25
$-0.27
$-0.06
Q1 25
$-0.40
$-0.67
Q4 24
$-0.30
$-0.23
Q3 24
$-0.60
$-0.11
Q2 24
$-0.56
$-0.13
Q1 24
$-0.42
$-0.05

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GREE
GREE
POWW
POWW
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$19.6M
$69.9M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$43.1M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-46.3M
$237.3M
Total Assets
$53.6M
$271.7M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GREE
GREE
POWW
POWW
Q4 25
$19.6M
$69.9M
Q3 25
$7.6M
$65.7M
Q2 25
$3.4M
$63.4M
Q1 25
$4.9M
$30.2M
Q4 24
$8.6M
$31.9M
Q3 24
$7.6M
$33.5M
Q2 24
$10.3M
$50.8M
Q1 24
$14.3M
$55.6M
Total Debt
GREE
GREE
POWW
POWW
Q4 25
$43.1M
Q3 25
$45.8M
Q2 25
$63.3M
Q1 25
$67.2M
Q4 24
$68.1M
Q3 24
$69.5M
Q2 24
$69.2M
Q1 24
$69.0M
Stockholders' Equity
GREE
GREE
POWW
POWW
Q4 25
$-46.3M
$237.3M
Q3 25
$-49.4M
$235.4M
Q2 25
$-61.2M
$222.5M
Q1 25
$-58.2M
$222.0M
Q4 24
$-55.8M
$299.6M
Q3 24
$-58.0M
$325.6M
Q2 24
$-52.1M
$342.5M
Q1 24
$-46.8M
$358.0M
Total Assets
GREE
GREE
POWW
POWW
Q4 25
$53.6M
$271.7M
Q3 25
$50.6M
$270.3M
Q2 25
$52.8M
$269.5M
Q1 25
$56.7M
$297.3M
Q4 24
$64.9M
$355.4M
Q3 24
$59.9M
$368.9M
Q2 24
$62.9M
$398.6M
Q1 24
$74.6M
$403.0M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GREE
GREE
POWW
POWW
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-15.0M
$5.7M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$5.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
37.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
4.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-4.98×
2.55×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-2.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GREE
GREE
POWW
POWW
Q4 25
$-15.0M
$5.7M
Q3 25
$120.0K
$3.2M
Q2 25
$-4.8M
$-6.7M
Q1 25
$-5.7M
$-1.5M
Q4 24
$-12.0M
$1.3M
Q3 24
$-1.9M
$-9.3M
Q2 24
$-1.4M
$-547.5K
Q1 24
$-5.1M
$4.3M
Free Cash Flow
GREE
GREE
POWW
POWW
Q4 25
$5.0M
Q3 25
$2.5M
Q2 25
$-7.6M
Q1 25
$-2.3M
Q4 24
$720.3K
Q3 24
$-10.6M
Q2 24
$-1.3M
Q1 24
$1.4M
FCF Margin
GREE
GREE
POWW
POWW
Q4 25
37.6%
Q3 25
21.0%
Q2 25
-63.8%
Q1 25
-18.6%
Q4 24
5.8%
Q3 24
-88.3%
Q2 24
-11.0%
Q1 24
-2.8%
Capex Intensity
GREE
GREE
POWW
POWW
Q4 25
4.8%
Q3 25
5.8%
Q2 25
7.5%
Q1 25
6.5%
Q4 24
4.4%
Q3 24
10.4%
Q2 24
6.5%
Q1 24
-5.7%
Cash Conversion
GREE
GREE
POWW
POWW
Q4 25
-4.98×
2.55×
Q3 25
0.01×
2.29×
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons