vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Granite Ridge Resources, Inc. (GRNT) and IDEAYA Biosciences, Inc. (IDYA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IDEAYA Biosciences, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($207.8M vs $105.5M, roughly 2.0× Granite Ridge Resources, Inc.).
Granite Ridge Resources, Inc. is an independent upstream energy company focused on the exploration, development, and production of oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids. It operates low-cost, high-yield onshore hydrocarbon assets across key U.S. basins, primarily serving North American energy markets.
IDEAYA Biosciences, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on oncology, developing targeted therapies and synthetic lethality treatments for patients with genetically defined cancers. It advances a pipeline of candidates across multiple tumor types, partnering with industry stakeholders to accelerate global access to innovative cancer care solutions.
GRNT vs IDYA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $105.5M | $207.8M |
| Net Profit | — | $119.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -34.5% | 52.2% |
| Net Margin | — | 57.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.8% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 330.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.19 | $1.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $105.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $112.7M | $207.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $122.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $94.1M | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.7M | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | $89.0M | $0 |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.5M | $119.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | $-51.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.1M | $-52.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.2M | $-39.6M |
| Q4 25 | -34.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.4% | 52.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.9% | 57.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.19 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $1.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.07 | $-0.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | $-0.68 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.12 | $-0.53 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $786.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $367.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $605.8M | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $786.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $920.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $701.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $698.8M |
| Q4 25 | $367.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $300.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $275.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $250.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $205.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $137.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $605.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $643.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $642.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $631.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $635.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $660.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $665.3M | $931.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $674.0M | $935.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $990.5M | $973.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $966.7M | $961.5M |
| Q4 25 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.20× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $64.5M | $142.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $142.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 68.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $13.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $64.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.8M | $142.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $74.7M | $-49.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.2M | $-32.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $68.7M | $-43.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $142.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-49.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-33.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-45.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 68.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.36× | 1.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.11× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.75× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.25× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.58× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.23× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GRNT
| Oil And Gas Service | $87.6M | 83% |
| Natural Gas Storage | $17.9M | 17% |
IDYA
Segment breakdown not available.
